Samsung Q60T vs Samsung RU7400 TV comparison 2022/07

Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! ♥️

Samsung Q60T and Samsung RU7400 compared – Which TV is better?

Reflections Icon
Reflections
Image quality in bright environments and dealing with reflections
45%
Samsung Q60T 55"
32%
Samsung RU7400 55"
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle
Picture quality when sitting at an angle to the TV - Also relevant when sitting very close in front of a large TV.
39%
Samsung Q60T 55"
39%
Samsung RU7400 55"
SDR Image Quality Icon
SDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in SDR, i.e. anything that is not HDR.
76%
Samsung Q60T 55"
61%
Samsung RU7400 55"
HDR Image Quality Icon
HDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in HDR, so everything from HDR, HDR10, HLG to HDR10+ & Dolby Vision.
58%
Samsung Q60T 55"
40%
Samsung RU7400 55"
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series
Use of the TV for movies, series & documentaries - be it as stream, BluRay or in the TV program.
68%
Samsung Q60T 55"
54%
Samsung RU7400 55"
Gaming Icon
Gaming
Gaming performance of the TV especially for responsive games with focus on PS5 and Xbox Series X
58%
Samsung Q60T 55"
73%
Samsung RU7400 55"
Sports Icon
Sports
Suitability for watching soccer, Formula 1, Olympics and more, even with several persons
56%
Samsung Q60T 55"
42%
Samsung RU7400 55"
Equipment Icon
Equipment
Smart TV features, connections and general equipment of the TV
60%
Samsung Q60T 55"
57%
Samsung RU7400 55"
Samsung Q60T 55"
Samsung RU7400 55"
Rating v2.5
You want to support us?
Donate with Paypal

Samsung Q60T 2020

Affordable QLED for dark rooms and narrow viewing angles


Edge LED
Edge LED
VA Panel
VA Panel

Samsung RU7400 2019


Edge LED
Edge LED
VA Panel
VA Panel
Samsung RU7400
Attention. The Samsung RU7400 is an older TV for which the database is not up to date. Therefore, the ratings may differ.

Detailed comparison: Samsung Q60T or Samsung RU7400

Samsung RU7400
Samsung RU7400 55"
Reflections Icon
Reflections Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs Samsung RU7400
45%
Reflections
Reflections visible
No layer against reflections
Contrast
7000 :1
Max. Brightness
480 Nits
Video technologies
32%
Reflections
Reflections visible
No layer against reflections
Contrast
5700 :1
Max. Brightness
289 Nits
Video technologies
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs Samsung RU7400
39%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Viewing Angle
narrow
VA Viewing Angle
Reflections
Reflections visible
Reflections visible
39%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Viewing Angle
narrow
VA Viewing Angle
Reflections
Reflections visible
Reflections visible
SDR image Icon
SDR image Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs Samsung RU7400
76%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Edge LED
Edge LED
Local Dimming
Contrast
7000 :1
DCI-P3
ca. 79%
Energy consumption SDR
103 kWh / 1000 Hours
61%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Edge LED
Edge LED
Local Dimming
Contrast
5700 :1
DCI-P3
ca. 74%
Energy consumption SDR
- not available -
HDR image Icon
HDR image Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs Samsung RU7400
58%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Edge LED
Edge LED
Local Dimming
Contrast
7000 :1
Max. Brightness
480 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 79%
REC 2020
ca. 59%
Energy consumption HDR
113 kWh / 1000 Hours
Video technologies
40%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Edge LED
Edge LED
Local Dimming
Contrast
5700 :1
Max. Brightness
289 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 74%
REC 2020
ca. 56%
Energy consumption HDR
- not available -
Video technologies
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs Samsung RU7400
68%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2 Channels with 20 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
54%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Gaming Icon
Gaming performance Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs Samsung RU7400
58%
Frequency
60Hz
Response Time
ca. 8ms
HDMI 2.1
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 9.7ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
- not available -
73%
Frequency
60Hz
Response Time
ca. 7.6ms
HDMI 2.1
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 10.9ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
- not available -
Sports Icon
Sports performance Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs Samsung RU7400
56%
Frequency
60Hz
Response Time
ca. 8ms
DCI-P3
ca. 79%
42%
Frequency
60Hz
Response Time
ca. 7.6ms
DCI-P3
ca. 74%
Equipment Icon
Equipment Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs Samsung RU7400
60%
Operating System
Tizen 5.5
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2 Channels with 20 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
3
HDMI 2.1
USB 2.0
2
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Ambilight
One Connect Box
57%
Operating System
Tizen 5.0
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
3
HDMI 2.1
USB 2.0
2
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Ambilight
One Connect Box
You have found a bug and want to point it out to us? Report error
You want to support us?
Donate with Paypal
Samsung Q60T 2020
58%
Samsung Q60T
  • Deep blacks
  • Low input lag
  • Great Smart Features
  • Smart Home availability
  • Dolby Atmos via Dolby True HD
  • No Local Dimming
  • No DTS
  • No VRR
Samsung RU7400 2019
50%
Samsung RU7400
  • Deep Blacks
  • Contrast Ratio 5650:1
  • Low Input lag
  • Cheap Price
  • Smart Remote
  • Viewing Angle
  • No DTS
  • Poor HDR Performance
* Prices incl. VAT, plus shipping costs. Please note that prices shown here may have changed in the meantime. All data without guarantee. Most of the time, these are so-called affiliate links. If you click on such an affiliate link and buy through this link, we get a commission from the relevant online store or provider. The price does not change for you.
Not found what you were looking for?