Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! β₯οΈ
In terms of reflection resistance, many OLED models are usually not positioned above average, even if this point is perhaps suggested to you more positively in one place or another. Especially in dark scenes, light sources can quickly become distracting on the panel.
With both the G3 and the A95L, however, we can rightfully say that both screens actually counteract reflections well to a certain extent. But beware: more light in the surroundings makes the surface more susceptible.
One of the key quality features and therefore advantages of OLEDs is their ability to maintain a consistently bright picture without color shifts, even when viewed at an angle.
In short, both televisions have almost no shortcomings in this area. Conversely, this allows for flexible positioning and is particularly useful for viewing sessions in large groups.
While the overall performance of the Sony hardly changes compared to HDRHigh Dynamic Range – image/video with more dynamic range (contrast range) mode, the G3’s algorithm generally adjusts the brightness more strongly for large areas.
At the same time, the model is less affected by the automatic brightness control, as it is often the case with other OLED televisions. As a result, the reproduction remains at a constant level and ranks above the display of the A95L.
Once again, the bar has been raised twice a time in the OLED segment. Although the A95L has more than good values in this area, LG does not allow itself to be outdone with the G3 and can more than match it. Without question, both televisions achieve a performance here that only relatively few TV devices in this segment have been able to reach so far.
On one hand, this is clearly the classification in the top luminance level, on the other these screens are also missing an essential factor: sufficient brightness in the surface. You should therefore always consider how and when your TV is used. If it is often viewed in bright light conditions, it is best to opt for a strong backlight.
Film and series content benefit in particular from the outstanding contrast and a display free from blooming on almost optimal blacks. Paired with many HDRHigh Dynamic Range – image/video with more dynamic range (contrast range) formats and additional IMAX support on the A95L, both televisions create nearly optimal conditions for a full-fledged viewing experience.
As usual, however, you should help out a little in terms of sound. Due to the flat design, there is obviously still a lot of potential here based on the DTSMulti-channel-sound-system (Surround Sound) competing with Dolby Digital:X and Dolby AtmosObject-based surround sound format with 3D-Sound from any direction codecs offered. Ideally, you should use a powerful home theater system via the respective eARC port.
Despite the great gaming capabilities on both sides and the PlayStation 5 exclusive features, the G3 has several points that put this Gallery TV ahead of the competition here. Firstly, there is still the issue of HDMI 2.1 quantity on the Sony. Two ports are simply not sufficient for a top class device today.
Although both are compatible with Dolby VisionDynamic HDR-format with a color depth of up to 12 Bits and Mastering of up to 10,000 Nits Gaming, only the LG offers the HDRHigh Dynamic Range – image/video with more dynamic range (contrast range) format at up to 120 frames per second during gaming. Finally, the more attractive price-performance ratio also underlines our result in favor of the G3.
As both panels are capable of 120 HertzHertz is the derived SI-unit of frequency with 1Hz=1/s – When talking about TVs this means how many different pictures a TV can display in one second., movements appear much smoother and with less persistent blurring as soon as you activate the interpolationArtificial calculation of more frames than the source material has to offer function. However, you will have to accept potential artifacts if there is a lot of activity on the screen going on.
Low frame rates can lead to noticeable stuttering, but this can be removed in the settings. Color areas are displayed evenly by the televisions. As a result, the reproduction does not leave any noticeable spots or darker edges on the screen.
Each of the flagships has its own unique selling points. A special feature of the G3 is the Gallery Mode in combination with a flat design of the housing including plane wall mounting.
Sony is trying to score points with the A95L by offering a customizable stand design and the familiar Bravia Cam, which provides an extended range of functions.
In contrast to the Japanese manufacturer’s rather bulky Android solution, LG’s in-house webOS 23 makes navigation around the menus more user-friendly overall.
When comparing the LG OLED evo G3 vs Sony A95L QD-OLED, both devices from the 2023 model year clearly occupy the top ranks within the OLED segment, making them the top representatives in this area. In terms of performance, both devices are more or less on par.
The main differences relate to unique elements such as the design, gadgets like the Bravia Cam and the selection of available screen sizes. However, as is almost always the case, the decisive factor is likely to be the price. Here, the LG OLED evo G3 simply offers a more affordable option.
Consider that even the 83-inch version is currently offered at a lower price than an A95L with 77 inches. Therefore, LG’s top model comes out on top by a narrow margin.