Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! β₯οΈ
Like the Samsung S95B QD-OLED, the S95C handles reflections comparatively well and minimises light sources better than some competing models of other manufacturers.
Nevertheless, bright room lights can be distracting and impair the viewing experience. Both models have something else in common: you will notice a pinkish tinge on either the S95C as well as the S95B panel.
OLEDs hardly allow for weaknesses in one of their core disciplines. We can say the same for both models.
Although you won’t actually see any real advantage here, the slightly higher luminance of the Samsung S95C QD-OLED benefits the overall impression a bit more. From a wider angle, the picture remains a touch more visible.
Within the SDRStandard Dynamic Range – image/video with a conventional gamma curve (opposite: HDR) – “normal” videos mode, the Samsung S95C QD-OLED is on a consistently better level and displays contentΒ somewhat more brilliantly. However, the automatic brightness reduction intervenes a little stronger in high-light scenes than it does on the S95B.
An additional advantage of the 2023 model is its 30 percent lower power consumption compared to its predecessor. Thus, the energy efficiency rating also belongs to the S95C.
So far, only a few OLED models have been able to match the performance of these two sets in HDRHigh Dynamic Range – image/video with more dynamic range (contrast range) mode. While the Samsung S95B is already at the top of the brightness range, its successor can still clearly improve on this and generate practical values of over 1,300 nitsSI unit of luminance: 1 nit = 1 cd/m2 – The best way of measuring and comparing a TVs brightness at a good quality.
Unlike the SDRStandard Dynamic Range – image/video with a conventional gamma curve (opposite: HDR) – “normal” videos mode, however, the brightness control intervenes on a larger scale on the model with the Infinity One design. Despite more luminance, the energy consumption remains within a reasonable range and is quite lower than that of the S95B.
Film enthusiasts have a wide range of streaming options to choose from. Nevertheless, this is not quite the case with HDRHigh Dynamic Range – image/video with more dynamic range (contrast range) formats. Both TVs lack support for Dolby VisionDynamic HDR-format with a color depth of up to 12 Bits and Mastering of up to 10,000 Nits content as its usually the case. Instead, you get HDR10+License-free, dynamic HDR-format in competition with Dolby Vision Adaptive with scene and room light adjustment.
The familiar HLGHLG or Hybrid Log Gamma facilitates the transmission and reception of signals by combining the SDR and HDR signals. If the device supports HDR, the HDR part of the signal is used, otherwise the SDR part. broadcast format is also included. Unfortunately there is no IMAX Enhanced Mode available. In general, however, the missing formats are kind of well compensated due to the extremely high luminance.
While Samsung does not officially advertise support for the 144 hertz mode on the S95B, even though the TV is technically capable of it, things look different with its successor. Ultimately, however, only users of a powerful computer will benefit here.
Apart from that, both devices offer you the same amount of gaming equipment and are almost on a par with each other in terms of response time and input lag. In addition to the VRRVariable Refresh Rate – synchronizes the display’s refresh rate with the output refresh rate of the graphics card version by HDMI Forum, AMD FreeSyncVariable Refresh Rate with AMD graphics cards or consoles and Nvidia G-SyncVariable Refresh Rate for Nvidia graphics cards compatibility are also integrated.
Both TVs have an instant response time and therefore generally show little problems with unclear movements at first. However, a certain persistence blur at lower frame rates is still noticeable due to technical reasons.
In order to improve image clarity, you can use the motion interpolationArtificial calculation of more frames than the source material has to offer function with up to 120 frames per second. If there is a lot of action going on, even this mode reaches its limits and starts to cause artefacts on the screen, depending on the setting strength. A further disadvantage is the soap opera effect.
Since our comparison tool does not currently take into account overall depth or other dimensions, the rating in this category is narrowly in favour of the Samsung S95B. If we include the Infinity One design, the S95C comes out on top. In addition, there is the useful One Connect Box in the slim version.
Other differences include the audio system and the lack of a jack connection on the 2023 model for older headphones. Both offer Dolby AtmosObject-based surround sound format with 3D-Sound from any direction, but do not have DTS:X support. As far as voice assistance is considered, the QD-OLEDs are also on a par with each other.
If you are considering a purchase, both QD models have their advantages. However, with a total of 93 percentage points, the S95C rightfully scores a little better.
Leaving aside the increase in brightness compared to its predecessor, the QD model from 2023 offers two additional benefits with the One Connect Box and the Infinity One design, which absolutely justify the first place in our comparison between the Samsung S95C QD-OLED vs Samsung S95B QD-OLED. Plus, there’s the better size range thanks to the inclusion of a 77-inch version.
However, if you can do without a bit of brightness, a One Connect Box and a slimmer appearance in order to save money that you could invest in a decent home cinema system, for example, there’s generally no reason not to go for the S95B. However, bear in mind that 65 inches is already the end of the line.