LG OLED evo C3 vs LG OLED evo C2 TV comparison 2024/03

In this in-house comparison, we take a look at the differences and similarities between the LG OLED evo C3 vs the LG OLED evo C2. Both TVs come from the well-known and popular C-series, which has made a name for itself in recent years. Specifically for gamers, both devices are worth buying.
LG OLED evo C37
LG OLED evo C27
vs
Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! β™₯️

LG OLED evo C3 and LG OLED evo C2 compared – Which TV is better?

Reflections Icon
Reflections
Image quality in bright environments and dealing with reflections
86%
LG OLED evo C37 65"
79%
LG OLED evo C27 65"
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle
Picture quality when sitting at an angle to the TV - Also relevant when sitting very close in front of a large TV.
94%
LG OLED evo C37 65"
92%
LG OLED evo C27 65"
SDR Image Quality Icon
SDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in SDR, i.e. anything that is not HDR.
95%
LG OLED evo C37 65"
95%
LG OLED evo C27 65"
HDR Image Quality Icon
HDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in HDR, so everything from HDR, HDR10, HLG to HDR10+ & Dolby Vision.
83%
LG OLED evo C37 65"
87%
LG OLED evo C27 65"
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series
Use of the TV for movies, series & documentaries - be it as stream, BluRay or in the TV program.
92%
LG OLED evo C37 65"
90%
LG OLED evo C27 65"
Gaming Icon
Gaming
Gaming performance of the TV especially for responsive games with focus on PS5 and Xbox Series X
99%
LG OLED evo C37 65"
99%
LG OLED evo C27 65"
Sports Icon
Sports
Suitability for watching soccer, Formula 1, Olympics and more, even with several persons
84%
LG OLED evo C37 65"
84%
LG OLED evo C27 65"
Equipment Icon
Equipment
Smart TV features, connections and general equipment of the TV
93%
LG OLED evo C37 65"
88%
LG OLED evo C27 65"
LG OLED evo C37 65"
LG OLED evo C27 65"
Rating v2.5
You want to support us?
Donate with Paypal

LG OLED evo C37 2023

Successor with little innovations


OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections

The data sheet of the LG OLED evo C3 has changed only little compared to its predecessor. Therefore, the 2023 model does not make a major leap in performance. The Alpha9 processing unit and the new stand concept are somewhat fresher. Here, you can exchange the supplied base for an adapted version that has been specially developed for mounting of a compatible soundbar.

LG OLED evo C27 2022

Absolute next-gen gaming


OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections

With the release of the C1 successor, the South Korean company equipped the C series with the so-called OLED.EX technology. This makes the LG OLED evo C2 the first model in the popular gaming series with a second-generation OLED panel. Important advantages such as a wide range of gaming features and a great choice of HDR formats have been retained.

Detailed comparison: LG OLED evo C3 or LG OLED evo C2

Reflections Icon
Reflections Comparison

Avoiding reflection not the obvious strength

The reduction of noticeable reflections and other light sources does not work so well with many OLED TVs. Coupled with the often lower luminance, highlights and indirect light are therefore attenuated to a decent, but not really good level.

This is why there is a risk that the picture performance is already insufficient in normal daylight and good visibility will then no longer be possible. Both panels show a pink respectively violet tint. With the LG OLED evo C3, however, this tint is somewhat more subtle.

86%
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
Contrast
infinite :1
Max. Brightness
830 Nits
Video technologies
79%
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
Contrast
infinite :1
Max. Brightness
810 Nits
Video technologies
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle Comparison

Offering a wide viewing angle as usual

Both TVs have a great viewing angle, where the picture does not fade. Slight colour shifts are nevertheless caused by an oblique view. However, you will hardly notice this during daily use.

You can therefore take up positions far around the centre of the picture. To counteract image distortion at too wide angles, you should generally consider a diagonal of more than 65 inches, if space and budget permits it.

94%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Viewing Angle
very wide
OLED Viewing Angle
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
92%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Viewing Angle
very wide
OLED Viewing Angle
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
SDR image Icon
SDR image Comparison

Tiny lead for the LG OLED evo C3

Although smaller areas are generally not as bright on the panel using this mode, the LG OLED evo C3 has slight advantages in terms of surface brightness.

Here, the LG OLED evo C2 is not quite as strong. On top of that, the ABL in the 2023 model is a little more restrained than in the predecessor. When it comes to energy efficiency, the OLEDs are on the same consumption level.

95%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Contrast
infinite :1
DCI-P3
ca. 74%
Energy consumption SDR
97 kWh / 1000 Hours
95%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Contrast
infinite :1
DCI-P3
ca. 79%
Energy consumption SDR
97 kWh / 1000 Hours
HDR image Icon
HDR image Comparison

Increased ABL intervention on LG OLED evo C2

Whereas the aforementioned area brightness in SDR mode gives the C3 a slight advantage, the conditions in HDR mode are equally balanced. However, since small, extremely luminous detail and image segments are limited more strongly overall by the brightness control of the C2, the successor can prevail when it comes to extended display of highlights and bright image regions.

Its lower power consumption rounds off the picture even further to the benefit of the 2023 model. In comparison with other OLEDs, both TVs perform well overall. However, the luminance is not exactly sufficient for bright rooms.

83%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Contrast
infinite :1
Max. Brightness
830 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 74%
REC 2020
ca. 34%
Energy consumption HDR
175 kWh / 1000 Hours
Video technologies
87%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Contrast
infinite :1
Max. Brightness
810 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 79%
REC 2020
ca. 63%
Energy consumption HDR
193 kWh / 1000 Hours
Video technologies
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series Comparison

These specifications call for a cinema night

The two models from the C series both feature an optimal, deep black and an outstanding contrast. Blooming is therefore naturally not an issue. LG continues to use Dolby Vision with IQ support for the C3. However, the follow-up to the C2 does not have an IMAX label either.

Instead, DTS:X is now available. Although the speakers cannot reproduce the codec directly, it is possible for the TV to pass the signal on to an external device as a passthrough solution. This option is not available with the C2.

92%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2.2 Channels with 40 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
90%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2.2 Channels with 40 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Gaming Icon
Gaming performance Comparison

Prepared for gaming all around

This is another category in which the two TVs literally go hand in hand. Equipment or performance overlaps are almost undetectable. Even in terms of input lag and screen response, neither side has a consistent advantage.

The specifications range from a 120 hertz panel and four HDMI 2.1 portsΒ to several image synchronisation functions such as AMD FreeSync. Cloud Gaming and the already familiar Game Optimizer are coming as well on both sides.

99%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.2ms
HDMI 2.1
4x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 10.5ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
ca. 6ms
99%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.2ms
HDMI 2.1
4x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 13.4ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
ca. 5ms
Sports Icon
Sports performance Comparison

OLED technology improves motion clarity

True OLED performance can be seen in the responsiveness of both screens. However, this results in a slight, technically induced blurriness that appears behind fast-moving objects. LG offers a BFI function with which you can counteract this.

We recommend not using this setting, however, as it makes the picture much darker. Given the comparatively low brightness of OLED TVs, this results in an avoidable loss of luminance in favour of a somewhat less clear picture in fast-moving scenes.

84%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.2ms
DCI-P3
ca. 74%
84%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.2ms
DCI-P3
ca. 79%
Equipment Icon
Equipment Comparison

Broad data sheets with few differences

While the LG OLED evo C2 uses webOS 22 as its operating system, version 23 is available on the C3. User profiles are still customisable in order to adjust the start page depending on your preferences. The easy navigation through the user interface with the help of the popular Magic Remote has stayed the same.

However, the Google Assistant is only available on the C2. In terms of sound, both TVs continue to rely on a 2.2-channel setup with 40 watts of continuous power. Apart from that, there are no significant differences among the other specifications.

93%
Operating System
webOS 23
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2.2 Channels with 40 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.1
4
USB 2.0
3
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
integriert
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
One Connect Box
88%
Operating System
webOS 22
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2.2 Channels with 40 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.1
4
USB 2.0
3
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
integriert
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
One Connect Box
You have found a bug and want to point it out to us? Report error

Our conclusion:
Little novelties vs lower price

Whether the LG OLED evo C3 actually has a real justification as a successor model in view of the fairly manageable differences is at least debatable.

If you don’t yet own an OLED or still have a “older device” at home, you are buying a good and excellently equipped TV with the 2023 version.

If you already own one of the predecessors from previous years, we advise against buying one. The differences in our comparison between the LG OLED evo C3 vs LG OLED evo C2 are too marginal.

Especially compared to its direct predecessor, you don’t really get any significant added value from LG. On the other hand, the C2 is now available at a much more attractive price, with barely worse performance and features.

You want to support us?
Donate with Paypal
LG OLED evo C37 2023
91%
LG OLED evo C37
  • High contrast with perfect black
  • Extremely short response time
  • Next-Gen gaming with a lot of features
  • Best viewing angle stability
  • AI controlled sound adjustment
  • Wide range of sizes
  • Strong intervention through automatic dimming
  • HDR10+ missing
LG OLED evo C27 2022
90%
LG OLED evo C27
  • Precise color reproduction
  • Brilliant picture quality
  • High contrast image with perfect black
  • Great reflection behavior
  • Everything you need for gaming
  • ABL greift stark ein
* Prices incl. VAT, plus shipping costs. Please note that prices shown here may have changed in the meantime. All data without guarantee. Most of the time, these are so-called affiliate links. If you click on such an affiliate link and buy through this link, we get a commission from the relevant online store or provider. The price does not change for you.
Not found what you were looking for?