LG OLED evo G3 vs Samsung S95C QD-OLED TV comparison 2023/06

It is the year 2023 and the two tech companies called LG and Samsung have launched their new flagships on the TV market. Both devices represent the state of the art in the television industry. Thus, the duel between the LG OLED evo G3 vs Samsung S95C QD-OLED promises to be an exciting one. But which is the better?
LG OLED evo G39
Samsung S95C
vs
Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! β™₯️

LG OLED evo G3 and Samsung S95C QD-OLED compared – Which TV is better?

Reflections Icon
Reflections
Image quality in bright environments and dealing with reflections
90%
LG OLED evo G39 65"
94%
Samsung S95C 65"
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle
Picture quality when sitting at an angle to the TV - Also relevant when sitting very close in front of a large TV.
95%
LG OLED evo G39 65"
98%
Samsung S95C 65"
SDR Image Quality Icon
SDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in SDR, i.e. anything that is not HDR.
97%
LG OLED evo G39 65"
97%
Samsung S95C 65"
HDR Image Quality Icon
HDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in HDR, so everything from HDR, HDR10, HLG to HDR10+ & Dolby Vision.
89%
LG OLED evo G39 65"
87%
Samsung S95C 65"
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series
Use of the TV for movies, series & documentaries - be it as stream, BluRay or in the TV program.
95%
LG OLED evo G39 65"
88%
Samsung S95C 65"
Gaming Icon
Gaming
Gaming performance of the TV especially for responsive games with focus on PS5 and Xbox Series X
99%
LG OLED evo G39 65"
99%
Samsung S95C 65"
Sports Icon
Sports
Suitability for watching soccer, Formula 1, Olympics and more, even with several persons
89%
LG OLED evo G39 65"
91%
Samsung S95C 65"
Equipment Icon
Equipment
Smart TV features, connections and general equipment of the TV
95%
LG OLED evo G39 65"
84%
Samsung S95C 65"
LG OLED evo G39 65"
Samsung S95C 65"
Rating v2.5
You want to support us?
Donate with Paypal

LG OLED evo G39 2023

OLED technology in the third generation


Heat Sink
Heat Sink
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections

Building on the strong heritage of the LG OLED evo range, the G3 offers an impressive display based on the newly introduced MLA technology. Advanced image processing and optimisation options, 120 Hertz, HDMI 2.1 ports and a host of gaming features including NVIDIA G-Sync and AMD FreeSync round out the feature set.

Samsung S95C 2023

QD OLED with One Connect Box


QD-OLED Panel
QD-OLED  Panel
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections

The S95C is Samsung’s flagship OLED for 2023, and with its Quantum Matrix processor, 144 Hertz refresh rate, advanced gaming features and the One Connect Box added this year, this TV makes itself all the more attractive and raises the bar again in terms of performance.

Detailed comparison: LG OLED evo G3 or Samsung S95C QD-OLED

Reflections Icon
Reflections Comparison

Effective minimisation of glare

With the newly introduced so-called Vanta Black coating, the G3 can catch up with the S95C in terms of reflection resistance. However, both TVs – like their predecessors – still have a visible colour cast, which is violet on the G3 and tends towards a pinkish hue on the S95C.

90%
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
Contrast
infinite :1
Max. Brightness
1470 Nits
Video technologies
94%
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
Contrast
infinite :1
Max. Brightness
1350 Nits
Video technologies
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle Comparison

More than enough visibility for everyone

As we all know, one of several advantages that OLED technology offers is high viewing angle stability, which means that there is virtually no loss of quality, even from a particularly slanted perspective.

That’s why you don’t have to worry about this at all with both models and can enjoy a consistently good picture even in large groups.

95%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Viewing Angle
very wide
OLED Viewing Angle
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
98%
Panel type
QD-OLED Panel
QD-OLED Panel
Viewing Angle
very wide
OLED Viewing Angle
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
SDR image Icon
SDR image Comparison

Brighter at standard colours

Considering OLED standards, both TVs deliver really good results in the SDR range. When viewed across the entire screen, however, the G3’s Automatic Brightness Limiter allows for a little more luminance.

On the other hand, Samsung’s brightness control is sharper and therefore reduces bright scenes considerably more. As a result, the S95C is not perceived as being any brighter than in HDR mode when it comes to high-luminance content across large areas.

97%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Contrast
infinite :1
DCI-P3
ca. 89%
Energy consumption SDR
97 kWh / 1000 Hours
97%
Panel type
QD-OLED Panel
QD-OLED Panel
Contrast
infinite :1
DCI-P3
ca. 98%
Energy consumption SDR
102 kWh / 1000 Hours
HDR image Icon
HDR image Comparison

Competition for the brightness title

As soon as the TVs switch to high dynamic range, the situation is somewhat different. While the G3 displays a higher peak brightness across wide areas in HDR mode, Samsung keeps its lead with the S95C across the entire screen surface here.

Without a doubt, both sets clearly belong to the TV elite and show that the brightness curve for OLEDs is also steadily moving upwards. Nevertheless, you should take this statement with a grain of salt, as backlit TVs still have advantages in bright and very bright light conditions.

89%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Contrast
infinite :1
Max. Brightness
1470 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 89%
REC 2020
ca. 39%
Energy consumption HDR
222 kWh / 1000 Hours
Video technologies
87%
Panel type
QD-OLED Panel
QD-OLED Panel
Contrast
infinite :1
Max. Brightness
1350 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 98%
REC 2020
ca. 55%
Energy consumption HDR
183 kWh / 1000 Hours
Video technologies
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series Comparison

Enhanced home cinema experience

Both TVs support all of the usual streaming services available today and provide you with perfect black levels free of halo effects. However, you will find differences within the variety of HDR formats.

As expected, LG continues to use Dolby Vision including the IQ variant and the normal HDR10 standard. Samsung, as usual, does not use this option, preferring to save the licence fee for Dolby’s product and offers HDR10+ and HDR10+ Adaptive instead. However, cinema lovers will have to do without IMAX support completely.

95%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
4.2 Channels with 60 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
88%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
4.2.2 Channels with 70 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Gaming Icon
Gaming performance Comparison

Sync technologies and 144 hertz

Both TVs are great options for gamers that are looking for low latency and support of 4K at 120 Hertz. However, the S95C goes a step further with its hardware compatibility and provides PC owners with a 144 Hertz option at Full HD resolution and above.

If you have a high-performance machine, you can use the panel to its full potential. Additional functions such as a variable frame rate via AMD FreeSync and Nvidia G-Sync add a decent finishing touch to the gaming equipment. However, you will not be able to use Dolby Vision Gaming on the Samsung.

99%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.2ms
HDMI 2.1
4x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 10.2ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
ca. 6ms
99%
Frequency
144Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.2ms
HDMI 2.1
4x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 9.4ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
ca. 5ms
Sports Icon
Sports performance Comparison

Responsive screens

Thanks to their high refresh rate in combination with the interframe calculation and the responsive displays, you are looking at a clean picture almost all the time. The Samsung’s intermediate frame calculation is limited to 120 frames however.

When a lot is happening, the sharpness of movement remains mostly at a high level and captures scenes clearly. In addition, there is an accurate reproduction of large colour areas. So you don’t have to worry about blotchy playing fields.

89%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.2ms
DCI-P3
ca. 89%
91%
Frequency
144Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.2ms
DCI-P3
ca. 98%
Equipment Icon
Equipment Comparison

Balanced feature race

Features such as voice control and smart home integration can be found on both platforms. However, due to its Apple interfaces, the LG offers you a little more connectivity options in this category.

If you prefer DTS:X or want to keep this option open, the Samsung will leave you empty-handed. Although the G3 does not provide direct output of this codec via its speakers, it can forward the format to compatible home cinema systems and soundbars.

On the other hand, you will find a better solution for cable management with the S95C and the One Connect Box that comes with it. The flat connection box can be placed freely around the TV and allows easy access to the interfaces.

95%
Operating System
webOS 23
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
4.2 Channels with 60 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.1
4
USB 2.0
3
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
integriert
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
One Connect Box
84%
Operating System
Tizen 7.0
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
4.2.2 Channels with 70 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.1
4
USB 2.0
3
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
kompatibel
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
One Connect Box
You have found a bug and want to point it out to us? Report error

Our conclusion:
OLED Titan vs QD Giant

Two heavyweights of the TV Olympus that set the OLED standard anew – just like their predecessors. Although the intersection of picture performance and features in our comparison between the LG OLED evo G3 vs Samsung S93C QD-OLED is relatively large overall, each of the models also has one or two exclusive features to offer.

Depending on personal preference, the purchase decision can thus go one way or the other. Although Samsung has added a 77-inch version to the QD-OLED series, LG is offering an 83-inch variant of the G3 and thus has an even broader product selection.

Whatever you choose, you can be sure of a first-class viewing experience with both devices that meets today’s expectations in terms of picture power and functionality.

You want to support us?
Donate with Paypal
LG OLED evo G39 2023
94%
LG OLED evo G39
  • Latest MLA technology
  • Top brightness values
  • High blink angle stability
  • Slim gallery design
  • Custom-fit bracket included
  • DTS passthrough
  • Anti-reflective coating with a slight violet tint
  • Automatic brightness limitation partially acts strongly
  • Stand must be purchased separately
Samsung S95C 2023
93%
Samsung S95C
  • Class reflection behaviour
  • Large colour gamut
  • Low input lag
  • Wide viewing angle
  • Thin Infinity Design
  • Slim One Connect Box
  • Large bright areas are affected by strong dimming
  • No Dolby Vision support
  • No DTS passthrough
* Prices incl. VAT, plus shipping costs. Please note that prices shown here may have changed in the meantime. All data without guarantee. Most of the time, these are so-called affiliate links. If you click on such an affiliate link and buy through this link, we get a commission from the relevant online store or provider. The price does not change for you.
Not found what you were looking for?