LG OLED evo Flex LX3 vs LG OLED evo C2 TV comparison 2023/06

Choosing the perfect TV can be a challenging task. To give you a helping hand, we compare current TV models with each other on a regular basis. This time, it’s the LG OLED evo Flex LX3 vs LG OLED evo C2. Both models are from the year 2022 and are practically on a par in terms of specifications.
LG OLED evo Flex LX3
LG OLED evo C27
vs
Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! β™₯️

LG OLED evo Flex LX3 and LG OLED evo C2 compared – Which TV is better?

Reflections Icon
Reflections
Image quality in bright environments and dealing with reflections
75%
LG OLED evo Flex LX3 42"
79%
LG OLED evo C27 42"
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle
Picture quality when sitting at an angle to the TV - Also relevant when sitting very close in front of a large TV.
96%
LG OLED evo Flex LX3 42"
92%
LG OLED evo C27 42"
SDR Image Quality Icon
SDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in SDR, i.e. anything that is not HDR.
83%
LG OLED evo Flex LX3 42"
95%
LG OLED evo C27 42"
HDR Image Quality Icon
HDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in HDR, so everything from HDR, HDR10, HLG to HDR10+ & Dolby Vision.
71%
LG OLED evo Flex LX3 42"
87%
LG OLED evo C27 42"
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series
Use of the TV for movies, series & documentaries - be it as stream, BluRay or in the TV program.
82%
LG OLED evo Flex LX3 42"
90%
LG OLED evo C27 42"
Gaming Icon
Gaming
Gaming performance of the TV especially for responsive games with focus on PS5 and Xbox Series X
99%
LG OLED evo Flex LX3 42"
99%
LG OLED evo C27 42"
Sports Icon
Sports
Suitability for watching soccer, Formula 1, Olympics and more, even with several persons
83%
LG OLED evo Flex LX3 42"
84%
LG OLED evo C27 42"
Equipment Icon
Equipment
Smart TV features, connections and general equipment of the TV
91%
LG OLED evo Flex LX3 42"
88%
LG OLED evo C27 42"
LG OLED evo Flex LX3 42"
Rating V2.2
LG OLED evo C27 42"
Rating V2.2
Rating v3.0
You want to support us?
Donate with Paypal

LG OLED evo Flex LX3 2022

Lifestyle display made for the future


OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections

The inside of the LG OLED evo Flex LX3 is largely based on the specifications of the C2 from the popular gaming TV series. The unique selling point is the flexible OLED display, with which LG pushes the boundaries of display technology and addresses gamers in particular. Based on a total of 20 curvature levels, the 4K display can bend and thus sets new standards in the television landscape.

LG OLED evo C27 2022

OLED.EX technology from the C series


OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections

By introducing the LG OLED evo C2, LG expanded its highly acclaimed OLED evo series in 2022. As the direct successor to the C1, an OLED.EX display has since also been lurking in the C series. Robust gaming capabilities, a wide range of screen sizes paired with the performance of the Alpha9 from the 5th processor generation make this OLED an interesting all-round device.

Detailed comparison: LG OLED evo Flex LX3 or LG OLED evo C2

Reflections Icon
Reflections Comparison

Not completely reflection-free

Both devices have an anti-reflective coating that reduces backlighting on the screen. With the OLED evo Flex LX3, however, LG goes one step further.

An improved coating called Vanta Black minimises contours and reflections even more effective than on the C2. However, the violet colour cast on the display is still present on the Flex.

75%
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
Contrast
Unendlich :1
Video technologies
79%
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
Contrast
infinite :1
Video technologies
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle Comparison

Almost no hurdle in terms of perspective choice

Thanks to OLED technology, both models offer excellent viewing angles throughout. So there are practically no deficits in terms of picture quality. On the contrary, at some point you might run into the problem of image distortion if the angle becomes too wide.

Of course, this only applies to the OLED evo Flex LX3 in flat mode. As soon as you use the curved feature, you should try to be in the centre of the display and ideally sit within the recommended distance range of about 1.6 metres.

96%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Viewing Angle
very wide
OLED Viewing Angle
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
92%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Viewing Angle
very wide
OLED Viewing Angle
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
SDR image Icon
SDR image Comparison

Good, but not top

In terms of SDR characteristics, both models offer good performance compared to other OLEDs, but they do not come close to the luminance values of backlit TV models, especially in terms of fullscreen brightness.

Looking at the maximum luminosity, the C2 comes out with slight advantages. The power consumption of both devices is identical in relation to the 42-inch size.

83%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Contrast
Unendlich :1
Max. Brightness SDR
- not available -
DCI-P3
ca. 70%
Energy consumption SDR
52 kWh / 1000 Hours
95%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Contrast
infinite :1
Max. Brightness SDR
- not available -
DCI-P3
ca. 79%
Energy consumption SDR
52 kWh / 1000 Hours
HDR image Icon
HDR image Comparison

Small brilliance advantage on the C2

As soon as the lighting conditions are suitable for both devices, the generally great image quality can be put to use. Here, too, the main variant from the C series has the thread in its hand and delivers half a step more brilliance with the same energy consumption.

However, things get tricky with bright room illumination and rear-facing window fronts. Therefore, we can only give a limited recommendation here.

71%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Contrast
Unendlich :1
Max. Brightness
ca. 730 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 70%
REC 2020
ca. 32%
Energy consumption HDR
94 kWh / 1000 Hours
Video technologies
87%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Contrast
infinite :1
Max. Brightness
ca. 810 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 79%
REC 2020
ca. 63%
Energy consumption HDR
94 kWh / 1000 Hours
Video technologies
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series Comparison

Cinema experience at home

For film and series lovers, both models basically offer a great quality experience. All important streaming services are supported. However, you have to make slight concessions in terms of colour space.

As expected, the audio field also looks meagre. Apart from the lack of DTS:X support, the built-in sound solutions are simply not capable of creating an acoustic carpet that at least resembles a cinema experience.

82%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2.2 Channels with 40 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
90%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Gaming Icon
Gaming performance Comparison

Game fun on the next level

Both TVs are ideal for extensive gaming sessions. The models offer a low delay time and support many important functions such as a dynamic adjustment of the frame rate via VRR, the option to play back game content at up to 120 hertz and a game mode.

Of course, the curvature function of the LX3 is unique so far. In this way, LG achieves an even more immersive gaming experience and takes gamers completely into focus.

99%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.4ms
HDMI 2.1
4x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Max. Brightness HDR (Game Mode)
- not available -
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 9.9ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
ca. 5ms
99%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.2ms
HDMI 2.1
4x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Max. Brightness HDR (Game Mode)
- not available -
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 13.4ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
ca. 5ms
Sports Icon
Sports performance Comparison

Sport optimisation for fans

Thanks to high frame rates in combination with interframe calculation, both the LX3 and the C2 ensure a sufficiently good level of motion display. On this basis, even fast motion sequences can be captured more clearly.

An additional plus point is the homogeneous colour representation without conspicuous islands of spots or heavily darkened corner areas. This is an advantage especially for large, uniform playing surfaces.

83%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.4ms
DCI-P3
ca. 70%
84%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.2ms
DCI-P3
ca. 79%
Equipment Icon
Equipment Comparison

Equipment diversity on both sides

In terms of features and connectivity, both the C2 and LX3 offer you a wide range of features.

The devices are equipped with a variety of ports, including four HDMI 2.1 ports each for high bandwidth requirements, multiple USB ports for connecting various external devices, built-in Wi-Fi and Ethernet for wired connectivity.

Both devices support the so-called eARC standard for uncompressed transmission of audio formats such as Dolby Atmos. As an Apple user, you have the option of using Airplay and Homekit.

91%
Operating System
webOS 22
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2.2 Channels with 40 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.1
4
USB 2.0
4
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
1
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay 2
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
integriert
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
One Connect Box
88%
Operating System
webOS 22
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.1
4
USB 2.0
3
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay 2
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
integriert
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
One Connect Box
You have found a bug and want to point it out to us? Report error

Our conclusion:
Curved vs small brightness plus

In terms of performance, the two TVs are on a par. Nevertheless, you can find arguments for or against buying the other model. Core gamers who are looking for an alternative monitor or who have or want to set up a small gaming corner at home might be more interested in the OLED evo Flex.

Compared to the C2, this TV is simply more flexible and does not have to hide behind the main variant from the C segment in terms of specifications and performance.

The situation is different when it comes to price and size variety. Compared to the 42-inch version of the conventional gaming TV, you’re looking at a hefty premium with the Flex.

For larger living or gaming areas, the one-size-fits-all design in combination with the curved function might simply be too small for you to effectively benefit from this feature. Therefore, the choice here should be a slightly roomier version of the C2 to compensate for greater distances with the corresponding screen area.

You want to support us?
Donate with Paypal
LG OLED evo Flex LX3 2022
85%
LG OLED evo Flex LX3
Rating V2.2
  • 20 adjustable curvature levels
  • Perfect black level
  • Special anti-reflective coating
  • Adjustable RGB backlight
  • Integrated gaming microphone
  • One size fits all
  • Comparatively expensive
LG OLED evo C27 2022
90%
LG OLED evo C27
Rating V2.2
  • Precise color reproduction
  • Brilliant picture quality
  • High contrast image with perfect black
  • Great reflection behavior
  • Everything you need for gaming
  • ABL greift stark ein
* Prices incl. VAT, plus shipping costs. Please note that prices shown here may have changed in the meantime. All data without guarantee. Most of the time, these are so-called affiliate links. If you click on such an affiliate link and buy through this link, we get a commission from the relevant online store or provider. The price does not change for you.
The following comparisons might also interest you:
      Not found what you were looking for?