LG OLED evo Flex LX3 vs LG OLED evo C2 TV comparison 2023/06
Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! β₯οΈ
LG OLED evo Flex LX3 and LG OLED evo C2 compared β Which TV is better?
Detailed comparison: LG OLED evo Flex LX3 or LG OLED evo C2
Not completely reflection-free
Both devices have an anti-reflective coating that reduces backlighting on the screen. With the OLED evo Flex LX3, however, LG goes one step further.
An improved coating called Vanta Black minimises contours and reflections even more effective than on the C2. However, the violet colour cast on the display is still present on the Flex.
Almost no hurdle in terms of perspective choice
Thanks to OLED technology, both models offer excellent viewing angles throughout. So there are practically no deficits in terms of picture quality. On the contrary, at some point you might run into the problem of image distortion if the angle becomes too wide.
Of course, this only applies to the OLED evo Flex LX3 in flat mode. As soon as you use the curved feature, you should try to be in the centre of the display and ideally sit within the recommended distance range of about 1.6 metres.
Good, but not top
In terms of SDRStandard Dynamic Range – image/video with a conventional gamma curve (opposite: HDR) – “normal” videos characteristics, both models offer good performance compared to other OLEDs, but they do not come close to the luminance values of backlit TV models, especially in terms of fullscreen brightness.
Looking at the maximum luminosity, the C2 comes out with slight advantages. The power consumption of both devices is identical in relation to the 42-inch size.
Small brilliance advantage on the C2
As soon as the lighting conditions are suitable for both devices, the generally great image quality can be put to use. Here, too, the main variant from the C series has the thread in its hand and delivers half a step more brilliance with the same energy consumption.
However, things get tricky with bright room illumination and rear-facing window fronts. Therefore, we can only give a limited recommendation here.
Cinema experience at home
For film and series lovers, both models basically offer a great quality experience. All important streaming services are supported. However, you have to make slight concessions in terms of colour space.
As expected, the audio field also looks meagre. Apart from the lack of DTSMulti-channel-sound-system (Surround Sound) competing with Dolby Digital:X support, the built-in sound solutions are simply not capable of creating an acoustic carpet that at least resembles a cinema experience.
Game fun on the next level
Both TVs are ideal for extensive gaming sessions. The models offer a low delay time and support many important functions such as a dynamic adjustment of the frame rate via VRRVariable Refresh Rate – synchronizes the display’s refresh rate with the output refresh rate of the graphics card, the option to play back game content at up to 120 hertz and a game mode.
Of course, the curvature function of the LX3 is unique so far. In this way, LG achieves an even more immersive gaming experience and takes gamers completely into focus.
Sport optimisation for fans
Thanks to high frame rates in combination with interframe calculation, both the LX3 and the C2 ensure a sufficiently good level of motion display. On this basis, even fast motion sequences can be captured more clearly.
An additional plus point is the homogeneous colour representation without conspicuous islands of spots or heavily darkened corner areas. This is an advantage especially for large, uniform playing surfaces.
Equipment diversity on both sides
In terms of features and connectivity, both the C2 and LX3 offer you a wide range of features.
The devices are equipped with a variety of ports, including four HDMI 2.1 ports each for high bandwidth requirements, multiple USB ports for connecting various external devices, built-in Wi-Fi and Ethernet for wired connectivity.
Both devices support the so-called eARC standard for uncompressed transmission of audio formats such as Dolby AtmosObject-based surround sound format with 3D-Sound from any direction. As an Apple user, you have the option of using Airplay and Homekit.
integriert
integriert
integriert
integriert
Our conclusion:Curved vs small brightness plus
In terms of performance, the two TVs are on a par. Nevertheless, you can find arguments for or against buying the other model. Core gamers who are looking for an alternative monitor or who have or want to set up a small gaming corner at home might be more interested in the OLED evo Flex.
Compared to the C2, this TV is simply more flexible and does not have to hide behind the main variant from the C segment in terms of specifications and performance.
The situation is different when it comes to price and size variety. Compared to the 42-inch version of the conventional gaming TV, you’re looking at a hefty premium with the Flex.
For larger living or gaming areas, the one-size-fits-all design in combination with the curved function might simply be too small for you to effectively benefit from this feature. Therefore, the choice here should be a slightly roomier version of the C2 to compensate for greater distances with the corresponding screen area.
- 20 adjustable curvature levels
- Perfect black level
- Special anti-reflective coating
- Adjustable RGB backlight
- Integrated gaming microphone
- One size fits all
- Comparatively expensive
- Precise color reproduction
- Brilliant picture quality
- High contrast image with perfect black
- Great reflection behavior
- Everything you need for gaming
- ABL greift stark ein
