Philips 8897 The One vs Samsung QLED Q70B TV comparison 2023/02

This clash between the Philips 8897 The One vs Samsung QLED Q70B is an interesting budget comparison of two TVs, which still don’t require you to make major sacrifices. Read on to find out how both devices perform against each other and what features you can expect despite the comparatively low prices.
Philips PUS8897 The One
Samsung Q70B
vs
Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! β™₯️

Philips 8897 The One and Samsung QLED Q70B compared – Which TV is better?

Reflections Icon
Reflections
Image quality in bright environments and dealing with reflections
43%
Philips PUS8897 The One 65"
49%
Samsung Q70B 65"
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle
Picture quality when sitting at an angle to the TV - Also relevant when sitting very close in front of a large TV.
61%
Philips PUS8897 The One 65"
39%
Samsung Q70B 65"
SDR Image Quality Icon
SDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in SDR, i.e. anything that is not HDR.
56%
Philips PUS8897 The One 65"
76%
Samsung Q70B 65"
HDR Image Quality Icon
HDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in HDR, so everything from HDR, HDR10, HLG to HDR10+ & Dolby Vision.
40%
Philips PUS8897 The One 65"
64%
Samsung Q70B 65"
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series
Use of the TV for movies, series & documentaries - be it as stream, BluRay or in the TV program.
66%
Philips PUS8897 The One 65"
72%
Samsung Q70B 65"
Gaming Icon
Gaming
Gaming performance of the TV especially for responsive games with focus on PS5 and Xbox Series X
88%
Philips PUS8897 The One 65"
94%
Samsung Q70B 65"
Sports Icon
Sports
Suitability for watching soccer, Formula 1, Olympics and more, even with several persons
69%
Philips PUS8897 The One 65"
63%
Samsung Q70B 65"
Equipment Icon
Equipment
Smart TV features, connections and general equipment of the TV
78%
Philips PUS8897 The One 65"
81%
Samsung Q70B 65"
Philips PUS8897 The One 65"
Samsung Q70B 65"
Rating v2.5
You want to support us?
Donate with Paypal

Philips PUS8897 The One 2022

Affordable Ambilight Gaming


Direct LED
Direct LED
IPS Panel
IPS Panel
Philips PUS8897 The One

By saying “The One”, Philips makes it clear that the PUS8807 was designed as an all-in-one solution for consumers and thus offers everything that is important. However, this is not quite true, and it cannot even be true due to the comparatively low price. Nevertheless, the backlit Ambilight TV with its IPS panel has a lot to offer.

Samsung Q70B 2022

High contrast quantum dot TV


Edge LED
Edge LED
VA Panel
VA Panel
Samsung Q70B

As a follow-up model of the Q70A, the Samsung QLED Q70B scores particularly well with its relatively high-contrast in combination with a reasonable brightness. This quantum dot TV can also pull a few other things out of its hat in terms of specifications. On the other hand, you have to accept some compromises in terms of picture performance.

Detailed comparison: Philips 8897 The One or Samsung QLED Q70B

Philips PUS8897 The One
Philips PUS8897 The One 65"
Samsung Q70B
Samsung Q70B 65"
Reflections Icon
Reflections Comparison

Average reflection handling

Strong object contours and light sources are definitely visible on both TVs in a deactivated state. Thus, the native reflection handling is rather average on the semi-glossy panels of these devices. Therefore, we can say that the fewer windows around the screen, the better.

43%
Reflections
Reflections visible
No layer against reflections
Contrast
1200 :1
Max. Brightness
460 Nits
Video technologies
49%
Reflections
Reflections visible
No layer against reflections
Contrast
7200 :1
Max. Brightness
600 Nits
Video technologies
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle Comparison

IPS keeps the usual advantage

Since we have two panel technologies with different strengths in front of us, IPS in the Philips and VA in the Samsung, the results are as expected and clearly in favor of the 8897.

The VA technology is just visibly less stable in this point and makes the picture paler and darker from a comparatively low viewing angle. The overall picture remains much better on “The One” and is thus also suitable for a side view.

61%
Panel type
IPS Panel
IPS Panel
Viewing Angle
wide
IPS Viewing Angle
Reflections
Reflections visible
Reflections visible
39%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Viewing Angle
narrow
VA Viewing Angle
Reflections
Reflections visible
Reflections visible
SDR image Icon
SDR image Comparison

Light bends are absorbed well

Despite their comparatively low peak luminance, both TVs can still counter reflections quite effectively during operation thanks to their background brightness and maintain a decent overall visibility of the picture content even in more strongly lit rooms.

Yet, the Q70B offers a slightly better performance. So, “The One” has to take a back seat in this category with a peak of about 460 nits.

56%
Panel type
IPS Panel
IPS Panel
Backlight
Direct LED
Direct LED
Local Dimming
Contrast
1200 :1
DCI-P3
ca. 92%
Energy consumption SDR
103 kWh / 1000 Hours
76%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Edge LED
Edge LED
Local Dimming
Contrast
7200 :1
DCI-P3
ca. 80%
Energy consumption SDR
96 kWh / 1000 Hours
HDR image Icon
HDR image Comparison

Higher performance on the Samsung

As soon as the devices switch to HDR mode in our comparison between the Philips 8897 The One vs Samsung QLED Q70B, the Q70B picks up in terms of brightness peaks and places itself ahead of the affordable Ambilight TV.

On top of that, there is a fabulous contrast ratio that ensures deep blacks and leaves the competition from Philips little chance to catch up. However, the Quantum Dot model is a bit more power consuming.

40%
Panel type
IPS Panel
IPS Panel
Backlight
Direct LED
Direct LED
Local Dimming
Contrast
1200 :1
Max. Brightness
460 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 92%
REC 2020
ca. 64%
Energy consumption HDR
184 kWh / 1000 Hours
Video technologies
64%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Edge LED
Edge LED
Local Dimming
Contrast
7200 :1
Max. Brightness
600 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 80%
REC 2020
ca. 59%
Energy consumption HDR
219 kWh / 1000 Hours
Video technologies
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series Comparison

Almost balanced

To counteract the good black level due to the high native contrast and the better brightness, the Philips offers a larger color space coverage. Thus, content is reproduced in a vivid and natural way.

Color transitions and edges appear clear and distinct. Bright details, on the other hand, are presented a bit stronger by the Samsung.

For an adequate sound experience, we recommend avoiding the internal speaker solution and relying on an external option in the form of a compatible soundbar to use uncompressed sound via HDMI eARC connection.

66%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
72%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Gaming Icon
Gaming performance Comparison

Next-gen gaming despite low-costs

In fact, both TVs allow you to use almost all features of the current next-gen consoles from Sony and Microsoft.

You not only get the ability to display 120 frames per second, but also features like VRR and AMD FreeSync against disturbing staircase effects during gaming.

Additionally, there’s a low input lag and a fast response time. Instead of four ports with HDMI 2.1 standard – like in the Q70B – you only have to deal with two in the “The One”.

88%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 8ms
HDMI 2.1
2x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 18ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
ca. 9ms
94%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 5ms
HDMI 2.1
4x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 11ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
ca. 6ms
Sports Icon
Sports performance Comparison

With slight weaknesses in detail

On both TVs, the refresh rate of 120 hertz is supported by the interframe calculation with additionally calculated content, ensuring a clearer and cleaner presentation.

On top of that, the performance is enhanced by the panels’ nimble response time. When it comes to color consistency, the Q70B doesn’t really make a good impression, but it’s still okay.

The Samsung model shows a slight dirt effect and darker corners. On the other hand, the Philips is a little bit better in this area. This is noticeable in sports with large and especially bright surfaces.

69%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 8ms
DCI-P3
ca. 92%
63%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 5ms
DCI-P3
ca. 80%
Equipment Icon
Equipment Comparison

Connectivity that sets them apart

In addition to the usual, adjustable Ambilight function that awaits you on three sides of the rear panel of “The One”, this model scores with a special Aurora feature that immerses your room in an individual ambience including background noise. To complement this setup, you have the option of using Philips Hue lights. You also get DTS Play-Fi for wireless surround sound and multi-room.

Using the so-called Mimi Sound, you can adjust the tone to your hearing sensitivity. This is particularly handy for people with hearing impairments. On the other hand, Q-Symphony gives you the option to match the sound of the Q70B with a compatible soundbar. Unfortunately, the menu layout is a bit convoluted and therefore not as intuitive as in other operating systems.

The Tizen OS from the Q70B is quite tidy, easy to use and fluid to navigate through. An extensive app selection and the usual voice assistants from Amazon and Google are part of both devices. However, you will not see Apple Play on the Philips. This feature is only offered by the Samsung.

78%
Operating System
Android 11
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
2
HDMI 2.1
2
USB 2.0
1
USB 3.0
1
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
1
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
integriert
Amazon Alexa
kompatibel
Ambilight
3-seitig
One Connect Box
81%
Operating System
Tizen 6.5
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.1
4
USB 2.0
2
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
kompatibel
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
One Connect Box
You have found a bug and want to point it out to us? Report error

Our conclusion:
IPS color vs VA contrast

Due to the better picture performance, the Quantum Dot model wins by a few extra points in our comparison between the Philips 8807 The One vs Samsung QLED Q70B. However, you will see clear advantages as well as relevant disadvantages on both sides, which could move you in one direction or the other depending on your usage behavior.

While the Q70B is almost bursting with contrast and has a solid brightness, the Philips model shines with a great color representation, flanked by the 3-sided Ambilight and a resilient viewing angle. The score for connectivity also goes to the 8807. A bit more accessible is the QLED’s screen surface.

In terms of gaming, both TVs are truly outstanding and offer little room for criticism. The final level for brilliance is not reached in each case, but that is not really a surprise due to the comparatively low price range.

You want to support us?
Donate with Paypal
Philips PUS8897 The One 2022
63%
Philips PUS8897 The One
  • 120 Hz
  • Gaming-Features
  • HDMI 2.1
  • 3-sided Ambilight
  • Dolby Vision & HDR10+
  • Android 11
  • P5 Perfect Picture Engine
  • Dolby Atmos
  • Picture Quality
  • No local dimming
  • Different panel types
  • Black level
Samsung Q70B 2022
68%
Samsung Q70B
  • High native contrast
  • Deep black
  • 120 Hertz panel
  • Good color gamut
  • Many gaming features
  • HDR10+ & HDR10+ Adaptive Format
  • Dolby Atmos
  • Q-Symphony
  • Narrow Viewing Angle
  • Without local dimming
  • No Dolby Vision
* Prices incl. VAT, plus shipping costs. Please note that prices shown here may have changed in the meantime. All data without guarantee. Most of the time, these are so-called affiliate links. If you click on such an affiliate link and buy through this link, we get a commission from the relevant online store or provider. The price does not change for you.
The following comparisons might also interest you:
      Not found what you were looking for?