Samsung Neo QLED QN95A vs Samsung Neo QLED QN95B TV comparison 2022/10

This interesting comparison takes a closer look at the two top models from Samsung’s mini-LED lineup – more precisely, the Samsung Neo QLED QN95A vs Samsung NEO QLED QN95B. You can look forward to an overview of the most important differences between the two high-class TVs and some insights into the technology behind them.
Samsung QN95A
Samsung QN95B
vs
Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! β™₯️

Samsung Neo QLED QN95A and Samsung Neo QLED QN95B compared – Which TV is better?

Reflections Icon
Reflections
Image quality in bright environments and dealing with reflections
87%
Samsung QN95A 65"
88%
Samsung QN95B 65"
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle
Picture quality when sitting at an angle to the TV - Also relevant when sitting very close in front of a large TV.
78%
Samsung QN95A 65"
78%
Samsung QN95B 65"
SDR Image Quality Icon
SDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in SDR, i.e. anything that is not HDR.
88%
Samsung QN95A 65"
90%
Samsung QN95B 65"
HDR Image Quality Icon
HDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in HDR, so everything from HDR, HDR10, HLG to HDR10+ & Dolby Vision.
82%
Samsung QN95A 65"
87%
Samsung QN95B 65"
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series
Use of the TV for movies, series & documentaries - be it as stream, BluRay or in the TV program.
84%
Samsung QN95A 65"
86%
Samsung QN95B 65"
Gaming Icon
Gaming
Gaming performance of the TV especially for responsive games with focus on PS5 and Xbox Series X
97%
Samsung QN95A 65"
99%
Samsung QN95B 65"
Sports Icon
Sports
Suitability for watching soccer, Formula 1, Olympics and more, even with several persons
75%
Samsung QN95A 65"
76%
Samsung QN95B 65"
Equipment Icon
Equipment
Smart TV features, connections and general equipment of the TV
83%
Samsung QN95A 65"
86%
Samsung QN95B 65"
Samsung QN95A 65"
Rating V2.1
Samsung QN95B 65"
Rating V2.2

Note: These TV models are from different model years.

2021: Samsung QN95A
2022: Samsung QN95B

Please note that we update our valuation formula every year to reflect new technologies. This can lead to significant differences in the valuations.

Samsung QN95A 2021

A bright mini LED


Mini LED with FALD
Mini LED with FALD
VA Panel
VA Panel
Wide Viewing Angle Layer
Wide Viewing Angle
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections

The Samsung Neo QLED QN95A already has a comparatively high peak brightness. The local control of so-called dimming zones ensures a deep black, increases the precision in displaying image content and minimizes the halo effect especially in dark scenes. Depending on the size, the QN95B has more or less fields available on the panel. The 65-inch model, for example, has 792 individually dimmable areas.

Samsung QN95B 2022

An even brighter mini LED


Mini LED with FALD
Mini LED with FALD
VA Panel
VA Panel
Wide Viewing Angle Layer
Wide Viewing Angle
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections

With a peak luminance of up to 2200 nits, the Samsung Neo QLED QN95B is one of the brightest UHD TVs on the market and trumps its predecessor relatively clearly in this discipline. To generate these brightness peaks, Samsung uses a 14-bit HDR mapping under the marketing term Quantum HDR 2000. Together with a comprehensive set of features, this model leaves few wishes unfulfilled and offers a picture quality that is aimed at demanding buyers.

Detailed comparison: Samsung Neo QLED QN95A or Samsung Neo QLED QN95B

Reflections Icon
Reflections Comparison

Good handling of reflections

The QN95B’s anti-reflective coating does as well as expected when displaying bright pictures. The QN95A also cuts a great figure in this area. On closer inspection, however, both models exhibit a rainbow cast that is particularly visible in dark scenes – a well-known drawback of glossy screen coatings.

Thanks to their exceptionally good brightness, both TVs are perfectly suited to do a good job even in a lot of ambient light and effectively counteract external light sources.

87%
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
Contrast
26000 :1
Video technologies
88%
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
Contrast
29500 :1
Video technologies
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle Comparison

Not leading but good

Although both devices have a special coating that is supposed to make the picture still presentable even from larger angles, differences to OLED TVs become apparent from a certain degree in our comparison of the Samsung Neo QLED QN95A vs Samsung NEO QLED QN95B.

This manifests itself on the one hand in an overall darker picture and on the other hand in a visibly paler color saturation. A certain viewing angle stability is generally guaranteed, but it has to be subordinated to the quality of TVs that work with self-luminous pixels.

78%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Viewing Angle
Wide Viewing Angle Layer
Wide Viewing Angle Layer
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
78%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Viewing Angle
Wide Viewing Angle Layer
Wide Viewing Angle Layer
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
SDR image Icon
SDR image Comparison

Massive contrast

With a high contrast ratio, both models can take some points in this category in our comparison of the Samsung Neo QLED QN95A vs Samsung NEO QLED QN95B. Edge areas make a decent impression thanks to mini-LED technology.

Even the 792 light zones of the QN95A – 720 in the case of the QN95B – cannot change the slight blooming. Combined with a slightly weaker black value, this is not enough for a quality on par with OLEDs.

88%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Mini LED with FALD
Mini LED with FALD
Local Dimming
Full Array Local Dimming with 792 Zones
Contrast
26000 :1
Max. Brightness SDR
- not available -
DCI-P3
ca. 90%
Energy consumption SDR
123 kWh / 1000 Hours
90%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Mini LED with FALD
Mini LED with FALD
Local Dimming
Full Array Local Dimming with 720 Zones
Contrast
29500 :1
Max. Brightness SDR
- not available -
DCI-P3
ca. 91%
Energy consumption SDR
122 kWh / 1000 Hours
HDR image Icon
HDR image Comparison

A real strength

When it comes to HDR in our comparison of the Samsung Neo QLED QN95A vs Samsung NEO QLED QN95B, the true power of the backlit top-class models becomes apparent. Bright picture areas and corresponding details stand out more than sufficiently from the rest of the picture content and make a radiantly beautiful impression.

82%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Mini LED with FALD
Mini LED with FALD
Local Dimming
Full Array Local Dimming with 792 Zones
Contrast
26000 :1
Max. Brightness
ca. 1860 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 90%
REC 2020
ca. 70%
Energy consumption HDR
242 kWh / 1000 Hours
Video technologies
87%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Mini LED with FALD
Mini LED with FALD
Local Dimming
Full Array Local Dimming with 720 Zones
Contrast
29500 :1
Max. Brightness
ca. 2200 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 91%
REC 2020
ca. 72%
Energy consumption HDR
205 kWh / 1000 Hours
Video technologies
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series Comparison

Clear path for debauched streaming

Both TVs in our comparison of the Samsung Neo QLED QN95A vs Samsung NEO QLED QN95B are made to work best in bright ambient light because they handle disturbing highlights and other light sources great due to the reflection behavior and the high peak luminance and always let you look at a sufficiently bright picture.

Of course, we also have to ask the quality question at this point and draw the parallel with OLED models. Yes, both the QN95A and QN95B put a decidedly bright result on the panel. However, the mini-LEDs cannot compete with the class of OLEDs.

84%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
4.2.2 Channels with 70 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
86%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
4.2.2 Channels with 70 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Gaming Icon
Gaming performance Comparison

Almost perfect for gaming

If you are a fan of digital gaming entertainment, you will be inundated with a bevy of gaming features that leave little room for improvement. This means that you will benefit from features like AMD FreeSync, G-Sync compatibility, a variable refresh rate and a short screen response time on both sides.

An extremely low input lag and a total of four HDMI 2.1 ports sensibly tie up this package. Nice to have, but currently not relevant for console gamers, are the 144 hertz that you can theoretically display on the QN95B. However, you will need a gaming computer that is capable of using this frequency at all.

97%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 3ms
HDMI 2.1
4x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Max. Brightness HDR (Game Mode)
- not available -
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 10ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
ca. 5ms
99%
Frequency
144Hz
Response Time
ca. 3.5ms
HDMI 2.1
4x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Max. Brightness HDR (Game Mode)
- not available -
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 10ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
ca. 5ms
Sports Icon
Sports performance Comparison

Not quite uniform

One weakness of backlit TVs is their sometimes uneven illumination and thus favoring color differences in uniform surfaces. Both the QN95A and the QN95B are no exception in this regard and exhibit one or two inconsistencies.

This plays a role especially in the transmission of sporting events that are played on large playing surfaces. Motion handling is also handled – favored by a 120 hertz panel.

75%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 3ms
DCI-P3
ca. 90%
76%
Frequency
144Hz
Response Time
ca. 3.5ms
DCI-P3
ca. 91%
Equipment Icon
Equipment Comparison

Extended equipment frame

While you still find Tizen version 6 in the QN95A, you already navigate through the redesign of the in-house operating system version 7 in the successor. Unfortunately, the software refresh did not exactly contribute to the overview and the restructured interface now looks rather cluttered. However, the extensive selection of applications has not changed negatively.

You can choose between Bixby, Alexa or Google Assistant for the voice assistants. Besides timeshift and a USB recording function, you also get a twin tuner, Apple Airplay, HDMI eARC, Dolby Atmos and the option to use a CI+ 1.4 card.

The real equipment highlight in our comparison of the Samsung Neo QLED QN95A vs Samsung NEO QLED QN95B and at the same time the unique selling point in the portfolio of the 4K top models is the so-called One Connect Box, which makes your cable management much easier. The removable connection box can be positioned freely in front of the TV and easily connected to the necessary devices on the back.

83%
Operating System
Tizen 6.0
Image processor
- not specified -
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
4.2.2 Channels with 70 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.1
4
USB 2.0
3
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay 2
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
kompatibel
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
One Connect Box
Stand
Removable
86%
Operating System
Tizen 7.0
Image processor
- not specified -
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
4.2.2 Channels with 70 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.1
4
USB 2.0
3
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay 2
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
integriert
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
One Connect Box
Stand
Removable
You have found a bug and want to point it out to us? Report error

Our conclusion:
Bright mini LED against even brighter mini LED

Regardless of whether you choose the Samsung Neo QLED QN95A or the slightly brighter QN95B, both TVs generally provide a good picture, especially in bright rooms. This is ensured by numerous brightness zones that enable a more accurate reproduction of brightness ranges.

The brightness advantage is even stronger when you watch during the day. The good reflection behavior of both models rounds off the reproduction performance further. Console gamers will benefit from the extensive range of functions and the fast response with short input delays.

Samsung only owes us Dolby Vision at this point. If you are gaming on a PC, you can also make use of the 144 Hertz fast panel. If you want to finally put an end to your tangled cables, the One Connect Box is also more than a useful solution.

You want to support us?
Donate with Paypal
Samsung QN95A 2021
85%
Samsung QN95A
Rating V2.1
  • Mini LED VA-Panel
  • HDMI 2.1
  • Viewing Angle
  • Reflection Handling
  • No Dolby Vision
Samsung QN95B 2022
87%
Samsung QN95B
Rating V2.2
  • Classy 4K TV
  • Stunning picture quality
  • Vibrant colors
  • Superb contrast
  • Wide viewing angle
  • Nice Reflection Handling
  • No cables due to One Connect Box
  • Excellent gaming features (144Hz & HDMI 2.1)
  • Sophisticated Smart Features
  • No headphone jack
* Prices incl. VAT, plus shipping costs. Please note that prices shown here may have changed in the meantime. All data without guarantee. Most of the time, these are so-called affiliate links. If you click on such an affiliate link and buy through this link, we get a commission from the relevant online store or provider. The price does not change for you.
Not found what you were looking for?
''