Samsung Neo QLED vs Samsung QD-OLED TV comparison 2022/10

The terms Neo QLED and QD-OLED represent two technically different approaches. In order to give you a better overview of these panel types, we will show the essential differences based on comparable top models and reveal for which situation the respective technology is particularly suitable in this Samsung Neo QLED vs Samsung QD-OLED technology comparison.
Samsung QN95B
Samsung S95B
vs
Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! β™₯️

Samsung Neo QLED and Samsung QD-OLED compared – Which TV is better?

Reflections Icon
Reflections
Image quality in bright environments and dealing with reflections
88%
Samsung QN95B 65"
84%
Samsung S95B 65"
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle
Picture quality when sitting at an angle to the TV - Also relevant when sitting very close in front of a large TV.
78%
Samsung QN95B 65"
98%
Samsung S95B 65"
SDR Image Quality Icon
SDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in SDR, i.e. anything that is not HDR.
90%
Samsung QN95B 65"
97%
Samsung S95B 65"
HDR Image Quality Icon
HDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in HDR, so everything from HDR, HDR10, HLG to HDR10+ & Dolby Vision.
87%
Samsung QN95B 65"
82%
Samsung S95B 65"
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series
Use of the TV for movies, series & documentaries - be it as stream, BluRay or in the TV program.
86%
Samsung QN95B 65"
85%
Samsung S95B 65"
Gaming Icon
Gaming
Gaming performance of the TV especially for responsive games with focus on PS5 and Xbox Series X
99%
Samsung QN95B 65"
99%
Samsung S95B 65"
Sports Icon
Sports
Suitability for watching soccer, Formula 1, Olympics and more, even with several persons
76%
Samsung QN95B 65"
88%
Samsung S95B 65"
Equipment Icon
Equipment
Smart TV features, connections and general equipment of the TV
86%
Samsung QN95B 65"
85%
Samsung S95B 65"
Samsung QN95B 65"
Samsung S95B 65"
Rating v2.5
You want to support us?
Donate with Paypal

Samsung QN95B 2022

Outstanding brightness


Mini LED with FALD
Mini LED with FALD
VA Panel
VA Panel
Wide Viewing Angle Layer
Wide Viewing Angle
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections

In contrast to conventional, meaning “normal” sized LEDs, the panel of Samsung’s Neo QLED QN95B uses smaller mini-LEDs. Depending on the model size, different numbers of light zones can be controlled. Paired with so-called quantum dots, a more precise display of image content is achieved and the edge shimmering effect known as halo or blooming is reduced in dark scenes. Samsung TVs that use this technology have the suffix “Neo”, which indicates the illumination type, and “QLED” for the color representation.

Samsung S95B 2022

The combination of two technologies


QD-OLED Panel
QD-OLED  Panel
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections

The panel in the Samsung S95B QD-OLED’s casing is built differently. To be more precise, a layer of self-luminous LEDs does its work. Accordingly, no backlight is needed so that the picture can be displayed sufficiently brighter for the viewer. The main difference to conventional OLED TVs: The white subpixel is replaced by an additional blue layer with quantum dots. This change makes the installed OLED pixels more effective and thus ensures an increase in brightness.

Detailed comparison: Samsung Neo QLED or Samsung QD-OLED

Reflections Icon
Reflections Comparison

Usually the strength of LED TVs

Even though direct light sources are visibly weakened to a great extent due to the anti-reflective coating, the QN95B does not remain completely glare-free, especially in dark scenes. However, the S95B is quite the surprise. This QD-OLED copes surprisingly well with direct reflections and shows that even an OLED TV does not necessarily have to weaken in this category anymore.

If you look at common picture content in everyday use, the difference is only noticeable in a direct comparison. However, both models are not completely without disadvantages. While the S95B’s anti-glare screen has a pinkish tint, the QN95B’s anti-reflection coating shows a visible rainbow effect during reflections.

88%
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
Contrast
29500 :1
Max. Brightness
2200 Nits
Video technologies
84%
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
Contrast
infinite :1
Max. Brightness
1040 Nits
Video technologies
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle Comparison

The field of OLEDs

In our comparison of the Samsung Neo QLED vs. Samsung QD-OLED technology, both TVs are ahead in terms of viewing angle stability. However, if the angle of the QN95B is too wide, the color saturation will suffer and you will see a rather pale display from a certain point on.

The S95B doesn’t have this problem and delivers an almost perfect performance in this category. A large group can therefore watch together on the QD-OLED without any problems. But be careful: Of course, you will have problems with image distortions from a certain angle despite the good picture performance.

78%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Viewing Angle
Wide Viewing Angle Layer
Wide Viewing Angle Layer
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
98%
Panel type
QD-OLED Panel
QD-OLED Panel
Viewing Angle
very wide
OLED Viewing Angle
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
SDR image Icon
SDR image Comparison

Contrast matters

Thanks to the local dimming control with 720 zones in the 65-inch variant, the QN95B shows a great contrast and not only brings out bright highlights well, but also performs on a high level in terms of black value.

Well, if it weren’t for the OLED display of the S95B in our Samsung Neo QLED vs Samsung QD-OLED comparison. Thanks to the self-luminous pixel structure, the panel can completely turn itself off and thus ensure a blooming-free, optimal black even in bright scenes.

90%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Mini LED with FALD
Mini LED with FALD
Local Dimming
Full Array Local Dimming with 720 Zones
Contrast
29500 :1
DCI-P3
ca. 91%
Energy consumption SDR
122 kWh / 1000 Hours
97%
Panel type
QD-OLED Panel
QD-OLED Panel
Contrast
infinite :1
DCI-P3
ca. 98%
Energy consumption SDR
140 kWh / 1000 Hours
HDR image Icon
HDR image Comparison

The advantage of LED televisions

Backlit TVs are still the standard when you want a particularly bright picture. Here, the QN95B can play its trump card to the fullest and climb the brightness scale way up. At least that’s the case on paper.

However, compared to our subjective perception of brightness, reality often looks a bit different and shows that we usually only notice differences of a few 100 nits in direct comparisons. Nevertheless, we also have to pay tribute to the S95B and its – by OLED standards – excellent luminance in our Samsung Neo QLED vs Samsung QD-OLED tech comparison.

87%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Mini LED with FALD
Mini LED with FALD
Local Dimming
Full Array Local Dimming with 720 Zones
Contrast
29500 :1
Max. Brightness
2200 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 91%
REC 2020
ca. 72%
Energy consumption HDR
205 kWh / 1000 Hours
Video technologies
82%
Panel type
QD-OLED Panel
QD-OLED Panel
Contrast
infinite :1
Max. Brightness
1040 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 98%
REC 2020
ca. 52%
Energy consumption HDR
252 kWh / 1000 Hours
Video technologies
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series Comparison

Decisive point: Your usage behavior

Both TVs are without question among the best 4K TV devices on the market. However, you should also consider the usage behavior in your purchase decision to get the best quality out of long binge sessions. The overall better contrast ratio makes the S95B QD-OLED the perfect choice if you watch a lot and mostly in the evening.

On the other hand, if you use the TV mostly during the day and your rooms are also quite bright, our Samsung Neo QLED vs Samsung QD-OLED comparison shows that the QN95B is generally better suited for counteracting flares and other light sources thanks to its high peak brightness.

86%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
4.2.2 Channels with 70 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
85%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2.2.2 Channels with 60 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Gaming Icon
Gaming performance Comparison

On par with gaming performance

If you value a lot of features that make your gaming collection look more refined, you don’t have to worry about almost anything with either TVs. You get at least a 120 Hertz panel with VRR via AMD FreeSync, G-Sync compatibility, a short response time and a pleasantly short input lag in each case.

The QN95B even offers the option of firing its panel with native 144 Hertz. However, this is currently only possible if you have a correspondingly powerful computer. Console gamers cannot use this option. You can also play your favorites via cloud gaming without a console usingΒ Samsung’s Gaming Hub. However, a Bluetooth controller is required for this. The only drawback is the lack the Dolby Vision color space.

99%
Frequency
144Hz
Response Time
ca. 3.5ms
HDMI 2.1
4x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 10ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
ca. 5ms
99%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.3ms
HDMI 2.1
4x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 10ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
ca. 5ms
Sports Icon
Sports performance Comparison

Flowing movements throughout

The good response time of both panels is also noticeable during sport programs. It means that the picture runs smoothly even during fast camera pans and quick movements. The main difference is the display of uniform color areas on the screen, which is called uniformity. This can be particularly important in sports that are played on large, homogeneously colored playing surfaces.

Overall, the QN95B has a good representation of uniform colors in our Samsung Neo QLED vs Samsung QD-OLED technology comparison, but still shows some darker areas on the panel. The S95B with its OLED display does not have that. Brightness differences and thus imbalances are almost not noticed here.

76%
Frequency
144Hz
Response Time
ca. 3.5ms
DCI-P3
ca. 91%
88%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.3ms
DCI-P3
ca. 98%
Equipment Icon
Equipment Comparison

Two strong features packages

Both TVs are also very well equipped in terms of additional features, and they include numerous functions. You should pay special attention to the One Connect Box included with the QN95B. The small connection case puts an end to your tangled cables and can also be positioned individually. This makes access easier if you want to plug in a new cable or reconnect an existing one.

The redesign of the Tizen operating system is not necessarily one of the highlights the two models have, but it offers an excellent selection of apps and the internal voice assistant Bixby. If you do not like it, you can use Amazon’s Alexa or Google’s voice assistant instead. You will also find Apple Airplay. However, Homekit support is not included.

In contrast to the QN95B in our Samsung Neo QLED vs Samsung QD-OLED comparison, you will not see the so-called Infinity One design on the S95B. This is reserved for the Neo QLED and ensures a flush mounting on your wall.

86%
Operating System
Tizen 7.0
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
4.2.2 Channels with 70 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.1
4
USB 2.0
3
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
integriert
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
One Connect Box
85%
Operating System
Tizen 7.0
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2.2.2 Channels with 60 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
HDMI 2.1
4
USB 2.0
2
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
1
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
integriert
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
One Connect Box
You have found a bug and want to point it out to us? Report error

Our conclusion:
Peak brightness counteracts perfect black level

Our comparison of the Samsung Neo QLED vs Samsung QD-OLED technology shows that the quality of both TVs is so advanced that we strongly recommend questioning your own viewing habits before making a purchase decision. If you mainly use your existing TV for watching movies and series, you will usually do that in the evening. The Samsung S95B QD-OLED is the perfect choice for this.

If the TV is used a lot during the day and your home is also quite bright, the QN95B is the better choice due to its higher peak brightness. In general, however, both models clearly belong to the absolute top devices in terms of performance and are at the same level in terms of quality.

In the end, both technologies target certain preferences in combination with the prevailing light conditions and usage and definitely offer advantages and disadvantages that should be considered.

You want to support us?
Donate with Paypal
Samsung QN95B 2022
87%
Samsung QN95B
  • Classy 4K TV
  • Stunning picture quality
  • Vibrant colors
  • Superb contrast
  • Wide viewing angle
  • Nice Reflection Handling
  • No cables due to One Connect Box
  • Excellent gaming features (144Hz & HDMI 2.1)
  • Sophisticated Smart Features
  • No headphone jack
Samsung S95B 2022
90%
Samsung S95B
  • Unparalleled picture quality
  • Brilliant colors
  • Viewing angle stable
  • Extensive equipment
  • All gaming features for current game consoles
  • No Dolby Vision
* Prices incl. VAT, plus shipping costs. Please note that prices shown here may have changed in the meantime. All data without guarantee. Most of the time, these are so-called affiliate links. If you click on such an affiliate link and buy through this link, we get a commission from the relevant online store or provider. The price does not change for you.
Not found what you were looking for?