Samsung Q60A vs Samsung AU8000 TV comparison 2022/02
Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! ♥️
Samsung Q60A and Samsung AU8000 compared – Which TV is better?
Detailed comparison: Samsung Q60A or Samsung AU8000
Slight reflections visible
There are slight reflections on both TVs in direct light, but they are not as bad as it sounds at first. Both TVs are not very bright, but don’t worry, you should only have problems with reflections in really bright rooms.
Typical VA panel
Since both have a VAVertical Alignment, type of LCD Panel panel, both TVs also suffer from the typical narrow viewing angles of VA panels. Here, both perform equally well ….or poorly. So, if you plan to watch the TV with several people, you should rather look elsewhere.
Well suited for SDR content
Although both TVs have a relatively narrow viewing angle, the contrast ratio is comparatively good! Both TVs are excellent for SDRStandard Dynamic Range – image/video with a conventional gamma curve (opposite: HDR) – “normal” videos content, especially when you look at the price. Here you can already see that the Q60A is a tad better, since it has even higher contrast, but also the peak brightness and the color space are slightly higher. So you get more for your money if you decide to buy the Q60A.
Rather unsuitable for HDR
While both TVs support HDRHigh Dynamic Range – image/video with more dynamic range (contrast range) formats like HDR10HDR10 Media Profile – HDR with a color depth of 10 Bit in the Rec. 2020 colorspace and HLGHLG or Hybrid Log Gamma facilitates the transmission and reception of signals by combining the SDR and HDR signals. If the device supports HDR, the HDR part of the signal is used, otherwise the SDR part. and even the dynamic format HDR10+License-free, dynamic HDR-format in competition with Dolby Vision, it is unfortunately not enough for a breathtaking HDR experience on both. Here, the Q60A is again slightly better than its competitor the AU8000, but as said, you should not see a big difference to SDRStandard Dynamic Range – image/video with a conventional gamma curve (opposite: HDR) – “normal” videos here.
Cinema at a small price?
Even though both TVs can only provide a home cinema atmosphere to a limited extent, they are still very suitable for watching movies and series! Although you can only see the difference between HDRHigh Dynamic Range – image/video with more dynamic range (contrast range) and SDRStandard Dynamic Range – image/video with a conventional gamma curve (opposite: HDR) – “normal” videos material to a limited extent, the picture quality is definitely sufficient, especially for beginners. Dolby AtmosObject-based surround sound format with 3D-Sound from any direction can be transmitted uncompressed via the HDMI eARC port, so you can create the right popcorn atmosphere with the help of a soundbar.
Top für 60Hz Games
Unfortunately, both TVs lack some features for next-gen gaming: HDMI2.1, so 4K@120Hz and VRRVariable Refresh Rate – synchronizes the display’s refresh rate with the output refresh rate of the graphics card, to name a few. However, if you are not gaming on the latest consoles, i.e. Xbox Series X or Playstation 5, then the two TVs are actually quite well equipped. While both only have a 60Hz panel, most games only run at 60fps even on the latest consoles. If you are a fan of Nintendo consoles, you can do without these features anyway, since the Switch cannot even display 4K and the other features are not available either.
Suitable for sports - but not for get togethers!
When it comes to sports broadcasts, both can deliver a satisfactory result here as well. The picture quality should be sufficient for everyone in sports broadcasts, especially since they are not yet available in HDRHigh Dynamic Range – image/video with more dynamic range (contrast range). The response time is low enough that no action is lost here. Only the very limited viewing angle can be strongly criticized, since you should refrain from inviting many friends here, since the image can quickly look blurry from the side.
Samsung Q60A vs Samsung AU8000
The Q60A also has the edge in terms of equipment. It has the better remote control, which can be charged via USB-C and the solar panel on the back. Furthermore, it has a twin tuner instead of just a single tuner like the AU8000. Apple users can also look forward to Apple Airplay on the Q60A. Other than that, they are very similar here as well and there are no important differences. What else can be pointed out is the Ambient Mode on these two TVs. This allows you to display pictures, either already installed or your own, instead of putting the TV into standby.
kompatibel
integriert
kompatibel
integriert
Our conclusion:Strictly on budget or the better TV after all?
Simply put, both are solid TVs. Whether the QLED is worth it depends entirely on the surcharge. In any case, you get a better picture quality with the Q60A and you can see the difference. But we have to be fair: true High Dynamic Range is just getting started there, and if that’s what it’s all about, you might want to spend a few more bucks to get a TV with Full Array Local Dimming.
I know many would like me to mention the prices, but then the review would unfortunately only be up to date for one day, and that doesn’t help anyone. However, I can tell you at this point that I would definitely take the Q60A if it only cost a good 10% more.
- 60Hz VA Panel
- Contrast Ratio 4650:1
- Color range
- Input lag ~10ms
- Viewing angle
- No HDMI2.1
- No Dolby Vision
- Response Time 7ms
- Sound
- Contrast Ratio 3800:1
- Input Lag ~10ms
- HDR10+
- Decent performance in dark rooms
- Small Color Gamut
- No Variable Refresh Rate
- Viewing Angle
- No PVR & Timeshift
