Samsung Q60A vs Samsung AU8000 TV comparison 2021/10

This comparison of two Samsung TVs is about budget models that want to convince with their good picture quality despite their low price. Although these TVs are not recommended if you want to watch movies especially in High Dynamic Range, both TVs are quite suitable for everyday TV shows or other SDR content! The TVs could also be interesting for gamers, if you want to play on a Nintendo or older console.

Samsung Q60A
Samsung AU8000
vs
Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! β™₯️ Best wishes, Kamil & Vitus

Samsung Q60A and Samsung AU8000 compared – Which TV is better?

Reflections Icon
Reflections
Image quality in bright environments and dealing with reflections
47%
Samsung Q60A 55"
44%
Samsung AU8000 55"
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle
Picture quality when sitting at an angle to the TV - Also relevant when sitting very close in front of a large TV.
40%
Samsung Q60A 55"
42%
Samsung AU8000 55"
SDR Image Quality Icon
SDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in SDR, i.e. anything that is not HDR.
73%
Samsung Q60A 55"
63%
Samsung AU8000 55"
HDR Image Quality Icon
HDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in HDR, so everything from HDR, HDR10, HLG to HDR10+ & Dolby Vision.
56%
Samsung Q60A 55"
41%
Samsung AU8000 55"
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series
Use of the TV for movies, series & documentaries - be it as stream, BluRay or in the TV program.
69%
Samsung Q60A 55"
60%
Samsung AU8000 55"
Gaming Icon
Gaming
Gaming performance of the TV especially for responsive games with focus on PS5 and Xbox Series X
62%
Samsung Q60A 55"
61%
Samsung AU8000 55"
Sports Icon
Sports
Suitability for watching soccer, Formula 1, Olympics and more, even with several persons
60%
Samsung Q60A 55"
56%
Samsung AU8000 55"
Equipment Icon
Equipment
Smart TV features, connections and general equipment of the TV
76%
Samsung Q60A 55"
68%
Samsung AU8000 55"
Samsung Q60A 55"
Samsung AU8000 55"
Rating v2.0
Found a bug? Found a bug?

Samsung Q60A 2021

The beginner QLED

Edge LED
Edge LED
VA Panel
VA Panel
The Samsung Q60A is the most affordable 2021 QLED. It is great for everyday use, especially if you watch a lot of linear TV or content in SDR in general. Of course, the fact that it's the cheapest member of its lineup means you have to sacrifice some features. Here it is some gaming features, but you will also look for an excellent HDR experience in vain. If you are not interested in gaming and only watch SDR content anyway, you will get an excellent TV for comparatively little money!
43" (108cm)
QN43Q60AAFXZA
50" (125cm)
QN50Q60AAFXZA
55" (138cm)
QN55Q60AAFXZA
65" (163cm)
QN65Q60AAFXZA
75" (189cm)
QN75Q60AAFXZA
85" (214cm)
QN85Q60AAFXZA

Samsung AU8000 2021

Inexpensive all-rounder

Edge LED
Edge LED
VA Panel
VA Panel
Samsung's Crystal UHD series was one of the best-sellers last year. But Samsung also wants to bring out a convincing TV this year with the AU8000, which is even cheaper than the Q60A. Of course, you have to do without certain features here as well, but if you don't need them, you get a really good price-performance ratio!
43" (108cm)
UN43AU8000FXZA
50" (125cm)
UN50AU8000FXZA
55" (138cm)
UN55AU8000FXZA
65" (163cm)
UN65AU8000FXZA
75" (189cm)
UN75AU8000FXZA
85" (214cm)
UN85AU8000FXZA

Detailed comparison: Samsung Q60A or Samsung AU8000

Samsung Q60A 55" Check Deal
Samsung AU8000 55" Check Deal
Reflections Icon
Reflections Comparison

Slight reflections visible

There are slight reflections on both TVs in direct light, but they are not as bad as it sounds at first. Both TVs are not very bright, but don’t worry, you should only have problems with reflections in really bright rooms.

47%
Reflections
Reflections visible
No layer against reflections
Contrast
4650 :1
Max. Brightness
490 Nits
Video technologies
44%
Reflections
Reflections visible
No layer against reflections
Contrast
3800 :1
Max. Brightness
330 Nits
Video technologies
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle Comparison

Typical VA panel

Since both have a VA panel, both TVs also suffer from the typical narrow viewing angles of VA panels. Here, both perform equally well ….or poorly. So, if you plan to watch the TV with several people, you should rather look elsewhere.

40%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Viewing Angle
narrow
VA Viewing Angle
Reflections
Reflections visible
Reflections visible
42%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Viewing Angle
narrow
VA Viewing Angle
Reflections
Reflections visible
Reflections visible
SDR image Icon
SDR image Comparison

Well suited for SDR content

Although both TVs have a relatively narrow viewing angle, the contrast ratio is comparatively good! Both TVs are excellent for SDR content, especially when you look at the price. Here you can already see that the Q60A is a tad better, since it has even higher contrast, but also the peak brightness and the color space are slightly higher. So you get more for your money if you decide to buy the Q60A.

73%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Edge LED
Edge LED
Local Dimming
Contrast
4650 :1
Max. Brightness
490 Nits
DCI-P3
85%
Energy consumption SDR
77 kWh / 1.000 Hours
63%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Edge LED
Edge LED
Local Dimming
Contrast
3800 :1
Max. Brightness
330 Nits
DCI-P3
69%
Energy consumption SDR
G kWh / 1.000 Hours
HDR image Icon
HDR image Comparison

Rather unsuitable for HDR

While both TVs support HDR formats like HDR10 and HLG and even the dynamic format HDR10+, it is unfortunately not enough for a breathtaking HDR experience on both. Here, the Q60A is again slightly better than its competitor the AU8000, but as said, you should not see a big difference to SDR here.

56%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Edge LED
Edge LED
Local Dimming
Contrast
4650 :1
Max. Brightness
490 Nits
DCI-P3
85%
REC 2020
64%
Energy consumption HDR
140 kWh / 1.000 Hours
Video technologies
41%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Edge LED
Edge LED
Local Dimming
Contrast
3800 :1
Max. Brightness
330 Nits
DCI-P3
69%
REC 2020
51%
Energy consumption HDR
G kWh / 1.000 Hours
Video technologies
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series Comparison

Cinema at a small price?

Even though both TVs can only provide a home cinema atmosphere to a limited extent, they are still very suitable for watching movies and series! Although you can only see the difference between HDR and SDR material to a limited extent, the picture quality is definitely sufficient, especially for beginners. Dolby Atmos can be transmitted uncompressed via the HDMI eARC port, so you can create the right popcorn atmosphere with the help of a soundbar.

69%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
60%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Gaming Icon
Gaming performance Comparison

Top fΓΌr 60Hz Games

Unfortunately, both TVs lack some features for next-gen gaming: HDMI2.1, so [email protected] and VRR, to name a few. However, if you are not gaming on the latest consoles, i.e. Xbox Series X or Playstation 5, then the two TVs are actually quite well equipped. While both only have a 60Hz panel, most games only run at 60fps even on the latest consoles. If you are a fan of Nintendo consoles, you can do without these features anyway, since the Switch cannot even display 4K and the other features are not available either.

62%
Frequency
60Hz
Response Time
ca. 7ms
HDMI 2.1
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag [email protected] +HDR
ca. 10ms
61%
Frequency
60Hz
Response Time
ca. 7ms
HDMI 2.1
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag [email protected] +HDR
ca. 11ms
Sports Icon
Sports performance Comparison

Suitable for sports - but not for get togethers!

When it comes to sports broadcasts, both can deliver a satisfactory result here as well. The picture quality should be sufficient for everyone in sports broadcasts, especially since they are not yet available in HDR. The response time is low enough that no action is lost here. Only the very limited viewing angle can be strongly criticized, since you should refrain from inviting many friends here, since the image can quickly look blurry from the side.

60%
Frequency
60Hz
Response Time
ca. 7ms
56%
Frequency
60Hz
Response Time
ca. 7ms
Equipment Icon
Equipment Comparison

Samsung Q60A vs Samsung AU8000

The Q60A also has the edge in terms of equipment. It has the better remote control, which can be charged via USB-C and the solar panel on the back. Furthermore, it has a twin tuner instead of just a single tuner like the AU8000. Apple users can also look forward to Apple Airplay on the Q60A. Other than that, they are very similar here as well and there are no important differences. What else can be pointed out is the Ambient Mode on these two TVs. This allows you to display pictures, either already installed or your own, instead of putting the TV into standby.

76%
Operating System
Tizen 6.0
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
3
HDMI 2.1
USB 2.0
2
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ 1.4
1
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
kompatibel
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
68%
Operating System
Tizen 6.0
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
3
HDMI 2.1
USB 2.0
2
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ 1.4
1
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
kompatibel
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
You have found a bug and want to point it out to us? Report error

Our conclusion:
Strictly on budget or the better TV after all?

tvfindr Vitus
Vitus // tvfindr.com

Simply put, both are solid TVs. Whether the QLED is worth it depends entirely on the surcharge. In any case, you get a better picture quality with the Q60A and you can see the difference. But we have to be fair: true High Dynamic Range is just getting started there, and if that’s what it’s all about, you might want to spend a few more bucks to get a TV with Full Array Local Dimming.

I know many would like me to mention the prices, but then the review would unfortunately only be up to date for one day, and that doesn’t help anyone. However, I can tell you at this point that I would definitely take the Q60A if it only cost a good 10% more.

Samsung Q60A 2021
61%
Samsung Q60A
More about the Samsung Q60A QLED
  • 60Hz VA Panel
  • Contrast Ratio 4650:1
  • Color range
  • Input lag ~10ms
  • Viewing angle
  • No HDMI2.1
  • No Dolby Vision
  • Response Time 7ms
  • Sound
43" (108cm)
QN43Q60AAFXZA
50" (125cm)
QN50Q60AAFXZA
55" (138cm)
QN55Q60AAFXZA
65" (163cm)
QN65Q60AAFXZA
75" (189cm)
QN75Q60AAFXZA
85" (214cm)
QN85Q60AAFXZA
Samsung AU8000 2021
55%
Samsung AU8000
More about the Samsung AU8000
  • Contrast Ratio 3800:1
  • Input Lag ~10ms
  • HDR10+
  • Decent performance in dark rooms
  • Small Color Gamut
  • No Variable Refresh Rate
  • Viewing Angle
  • No PVR & Timeshift
43" (108cm)
UN43AU8000FXZA
50" (125cm)
UN50AU8000FXZA
55" (138cm)
UN55AU8000FXZA
65" (163cm)
UN65AU8000FXZA
75" (189cm)
UN75AU8000FXZA
85" (214cm)
UN85AU8000FXZA
* Approximate price incl. VAT, plus shipping costs. Please note that prices shown here may have changed in the meantime.
All data without guarantee. All trademarks, designs and logos displayed are owned by their companies.
The following comparisons might also interest you:
πŸ”₯ The Best TV deals and offers πŸ”₯ Get them now!
Go to Deals