For those looking for a rather small TV, the Samsung Q50R QLED with its standard size of 32 inches is interesting. But does it perform as well as its larger sister model, the Samsung Q60R in its smallest version with 43 inches? Find out here on tvfindr!
Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! ♥️ Best wishes, Kamil & Vitus
Samsung Q50R and Samsung Q60R compared
Which TV is better?
- Wide Colour Gamut
- Response Time: ~5,5ms
- Very low Input Lag
- Contrast 5430:1
- Viewing Angle
- 60Hz Panel
- Single Tuner
- No Local Dimming
- No DTS
- No VRR
- No HDMI 2.1
- Wide Colour Gamut
- Response Time: ~3,6ms
- Very low Input Lag
- Dual Tuner
- Contrast 6290:1
- Viewing angle
- 60Hz Panel
- No Local Dimming
- No DTS
- No VRR
- No HDMI 2.1
- 43'' & 49'': 60Hz Panel
- 43" IPS Panel
Detailed comparison: Samsung Q50R or Samsung Q60R
| Comparison winner |
Samsung QLED Q50R The Samsung Q50R is with 32 inches the smallest QLED on the market. It is therefore suitable as an additional monitor on the desk or for gaming with the console. While it has an optimal response time for gaming and a low input lag, some other features are missing, like VRR, local dimming or DTS. Moreover, it only has a 60Hz VA panel. So it is only suitable for connection to older consoles or the Play Station. A consequence of the Single Tuner is that USB recording (PVR) or timeshift is not possible. | Samsung QLED Q60R The Samsung Q60R in the 43 inch version is the next closest related model from the QLED series to the Q50R. In this size, it also only has a 60Hz panel VA panel and doesn't offer FreeSync, but from 55 inches upwards, both changes. Therefore it has a dual tuner and a better contrast in all sizes. |
| Panel type | VA Panel | IPS Panel |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 pixels Ultra HD (UHD) / 4K / 2160p | 3840 x 2160 pixels Ultra HD (UHD) / 4K / 2160p |
| Contrast ratio | 5400 :1 | 1100 :1 |
| Local Dimming | Nein | Nein |
| Frequency | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| VRR | Nein | No |
| Input Lag | < 14 ms | < 15 ms |
| Motion Handling | ||
| Color space coverage | ||
| Ø brightness | ||
| Max brightness | ||
| Reflections | ||
| Operating system | Tizen | Tizen 5.0 |
| HDR10+ | ||
| Dolby Vision | ||
| Dolby Atmos | ||
| DTS | ||
| HDMI 2.1 | ||
| Improved viewing angle |
| Comparison winner |
Samsung QLED Q50R | Samsung QLED Q60R |
32 Inch See price Amazon.com All prices | 43 Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk.ca 49 Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk.ca 55 Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk.ca 65 Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk.ca 75 Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk.ca 82 Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk.ca All prices |
Our conclusion: Similar models, but one clear winner
The Samsung Q50R and Samsung Q60R are on the same level in many respects, especially in terms of design and finish. The contrast is slightly better on the Q60R, but both have no local dimming, so that HDR content is relatively similar. Both the Q50R and Q60R have a 60Hz VA panel, so that the viewing angle is equally limited. However, this is much less disturbing with the Q60R due to its size. So if you’re looking for the perfect QLED for gaming, you won’t notice any big differences between these two models – except the size. But the Q60R scores slightly better in response time. It is also noticeably brighter and can remove judder.
All in all, the Q60R is in the leading position, also in terms of price, because despite the significant difference in size, both models cost almost the same. So, if you don’t have space problems in the living room, you should definitely choose the Samsung Q60R.
