Optically, they are two different TVs that come from two different generations. Find out for yourself whether the Samsung Q60T from 2020 or the Samsung RU7400 from 2019 is the better TV. Especially if your budget is below $1000, this comparison should be very interesting for you.
Samsung Q60T and Samsung RU7400 compared
Which TV is better?
- Deep, uniform blacks
- Dual LED
- Higher contrast
- Very low input lag
- Tizen 5.5
- Smart Home Features
- Dolby Atmos via Dolby True HD
- No local dimming
- No DTS
- No VRR
- Deep black
- Good contrast
- wide color gamut
- Low input lag
- No local dimming
- No DTS
- No VRR
- Tizen 5.0
Detailed comparison: Samsung Q60T or Samsung RU7400
Comparison winner | |
Samsung QLED Q60T The Samsung Q60T is the most affordable model in the QLED range from 2020, with a built-in VAVertical Alignment, type of LCD Panel panelThe panel is the actual screen of a television. There is different types of panels like OLED, LCD or Micro LED and different sub-types of LCD like VA or IPS. with dual LED that delivers higher contrast and better black than previous generation TVs. It also supports uncompressed Dolby Atmos via Dolby True HD Codec. The smart features are based on Tizen 5.5 and run smoothly. Unfortunately there is no variable refresh rateVariable Refresh Rate - synchronizes the display's refresh rate with the output refresh rate of the graphics card. The motion handlingDisplaying fast moving objects is also not as good. | Samsung RU7400 The Samsung RU7400 is an affordable alternative to the predecessor of the Samsung Q60T. Just like the Q60T, it doesn't support VRRVariable Refresh Rate - synchronizes the display's refresh rate with the output refresh rate of the graphics card or local dimming, but still has deep blacks and good contrast. In direct comparison to the Q60T, the Dual LED and Dolby Atmos feature is missing. Moreover, the smart features are not so good, as the RU7400 works with Tizen 5.0. Nevertheless, it is a very potent device that is available at a much lower price, if you are lucky. |
| Panel type | VA Panel | N/A |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 pixels Ultra HD (UHD) / 4K / 2160p | N/A |
| Contrast ratio | 7000 :1 | N/A |
| Local Dimming | Nein | No |
| Frequency | 60 Hz | N/A |
| VRR | Nein | No |
| Input Lag | < 10 ms | N/A |
| Motion Handling | ||
| Color space coverage | ||
| Ø brightness | ||
| Max brightness | ||
| Reflections | ||
| Operating system | Tizen 5.5 | N/A |
| HDR10+ | N/A | |
| Dolby Vision | N/A | |
| Dolby Atmos | N/A | |
| DTS | N/A | |
| HDMI 2.1 | ||
| Improved viewing angle |
Comparison winner | |
Samsung QLED Q60T | Samsung RU7400 |
43 Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk.ca 50 Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk.ca 55 Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk.ca 58 Inch See price Amazon.com 65 Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk.ca 75 Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk.ca 85 Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk.ca All prices | Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk Inch See price Amazon.com.co.uk All prices |
Our conclusion: 2020 QLED or is the Premium UHD from the previous year sufficient?
At first glance, these two TVs don’t have much in common, but in fact, the Samsung Q60T and Samsung RU7400 are similar. In short, the RU7400 is a more affordable alternative to the Q60T that does without some features that not everyone needs. So if you don’t need VRRVariable Refresh Rate – synchronizes the display’s refresh rate with the output refresh rate of the graphics card for gaming, don’t want the latest smart features and simply want a good picture with intense blacks, you can go for the RU7400.
On the other hand, if you want to experience the latest screen technology but can’t spend too much, the Samsung Q60T is better for you.
