Samsung Q60T vs LG NANO81 TV comparison 2021/05

Samsung’s QLED series and LG’s NanoCell series are probably the biggest competitors among the mid-range TVs. This time we compare the two entry-level models Q60T and NANO81 with each other to see which of the two less expensive models is the better TV for your needs. Because these are lower-priced models in the middle class, the features of both TVs are comparatively low, as the manufacturers save these features for more expensive models. Since both use completely different display technologies, the respective strengths and weaknesses also differ greatly. Therefore, you should think carefully about what is most important to you and under which conditions you want to use the new TV.

Samsung QLED Q60T
LG NANO81
vs
Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! ♥️ Best wishes, Kamil & Vitus

Samsung Q60T and LG NANO81 compared – Which TV is better?

Reflections Icon
Reflections
Image quality in bright environments and dealing with reflections
45%
Samsung QLED Q60T 55"
59%
LG NANO81 55"
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle
Picture quality when sitting at an angle to the TV - Also relevant when sitting very close in front of a large TV.
39%
Samsung QLED Q60T 55"
68%
LG NANO81 55"
SDR Image Quality Icon
SDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in SDR, i.e. anything that is not HDR.
76%
Samsung QLED Q60T 55"
69%
LG NANO81 55"
HDR Image Quality Icon
HDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in HDR, so everything from HDR, HDR10, HLG to HDR10+ & Dolby Vision.
58%
Samsung QLED Q60T 55"
49%
LG NANO81 55"
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series
Use of the TV for movies, series & documentaries - be it as stream, BluRay or in the TV program.
68%
Samsung QLED Q60T 55"
60%
LG NANO81 55"
Gaming Icon
Gaming
Gaming performance of the TV especially for responsive games with focus on PS5 and Xbox Series X
58%
Samsung QLED Q60T 55"
74%
LG NANO81 55"
Sports Icon
Sports
Suitability for watching soccer, Formula 1, Olympics and more, even with several persons
56%
Samsung QLED Q60T 55"
63%
LG NANO81 55"
Equipment Icon
Equipment
Smart TV features, connections and general equipment of the TV
60%
Samsung QLED Q60T 55"
68%
LG NANO81 55"
Samsung QLED Q60T 55"
LG NANO81 55"
Rating v2.0
Found a bug? Report error

Samsung QLED Q60T 2020

Edge LED
Edge LED
VA Panel
VA Panel
The Q60T is the most affordable TV from Samsung's famous QLED series. It uses like all other QLEDs a VA panel, which has deep blacks and a high contrast ratio of 7000:1. Therefore it produces a good picture quality in dark surroundings, which unfortunately cannot be further improved by the missing local dimming feature. The low peak brightness and the moderate reflection handling ensure that the picture quality is not quite as attractive in bright rooms. In addition, the viewing angle of the VA panel is very narrow, so that colors fade even at a slightly oblique viewing angle. Its motion handling is okay for a TV in this price range, but with a response time of ~8ms it is not very impressive. Therefore, fast movements cause motion blur, which the Q60T cannot reduce further. With the HDMI eARC interface it can create a rich, spatial Dolby Atmos sound in connection with external sound systems.
43" (108cm)
QN43Q60TAFXZA
50" (125,7cm)
QN50Q60TAFXZA
55" (138,8cm)
QN55Q60TAFXZA
58" (146cm)
QN58Q60TAFXZA
65" (163,9cm)
QN65Q60TAFXZA
75" (189,3cm)
QN75Q60TAFXZA
85" (214cm)
QN85Q60TAFXZA

LG NANO81 2020

Edge LED with Local Dimming
Edge LED with Local Dimming
ADS Panel
IPS Panel
Because the Q60T uses an IPS panel, its contrast ratio of 1350:1 and its black is not really convincing. This has a negative effect on the picture quality in dark surroundings - deep black scenes look rather grayish under this condition. On the other hand, it has a quite respectable image in bright rooms, which is due to its excellent reflection handling. In addition, IPS panels have the advantage that their viewing angle is quite wide, so there is no fading of the colors when you sit at an oblique angle to the display - which is probably the biggest advantage of the NANO81 compared to the Q60T. The IPS panel's response time of ~6ms is lower than the Q60T's, so its motion handling is slightly better; therefore, less motion blur is noticeable during fast movements. Gaming is really fun on the NANO81, as it has a very low input lag, but just like the Q60T, the LG TV doesn't have much extra features. The Edge Lit Local Dimming is not really an advantage as it is so poorly implemented and doesn't really improve the picture.
55" (139cm)
55NANO81ANA
65" (164cm)
65NANO81ANA

Detailed comparison: Samsung Q60T or LG NANO81

Samsung QLED Q60T 55" Check Deal
LG NANO81 55" Check Deal
Reflections Icon
Reflections Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs LG NANO81
45%
Reflections
Reflections visible
No layer against reflections
Contrast
7000 :1
Max. Brightness
480 Nits
Video technologies
59%
Reflections
Reflections visible
No layer against reflections
Contrast
1350:1 :1
Max. Brightness
540 Nits
Video technologies
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs LG NANO81
39%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Viewing Angle
narrow
VA Viewing Angle
Reflections
Reflections visible
Reflections visible
68%
Panel type
ADS Panel
IPS Panel
Viewing Angle
wide
IPS Viewing Angle
Reflections
Reflections visible
Reflections visible
SDR image Icon
SDR image Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs LG NANO81
76%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Edge LED
Edge LED
Local Dimming
Contrast
7000 :1
Max. Brightness
480 Nits
DCI-P3
79%
69%
Panel type
ADS Panel
IPS Panel
Backlight
Edge LED with Local Dimming
Edge LED with Local Dimming
Local Dimming
Edge Lit Local Dimming with 6 Zones
Contrast
1350:1 :1
Max. Brightness
540 Nits
DCI-P3
70.6%
HDR image Icon
HDR image Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs LG NANO81
58%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Edge LED
Edge LED
Local Dimming
Contrast
7000 :1
Max. Brightness
480 Nits
DCI-P3
79%
REC 2020
59%
Video technologies
49%
Panel type
ADS Panel
IPS Panel
Backlight
Edge LED with Local Dimming
Edge LED with Local Dimming
Local Dimming
Edge Lit Local Dimming with 6 Zones
Contrast
1350:1 :1
Max. Brightness
540 Nits
DCI-P3
70.6%
REC 2020
53.6%
Video technologies
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs LG NANO81
68%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2 Channels with 20 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
60%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Gaming Icon
Gaming performance Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs LG NANO81
58%
Frequency
60Hz
Response Time
ca. 8ms
HDMI 2.1
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag [email protected] +HDR
ca. 10ms
74%
Frequency
60Hz
Response Time
ca. 6ms
HDMI 2.1
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag [email protected] +HDR
ca. 10ms
Sports Icon
Sports performance Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs LG NANO81
56%
Frequency
60Hz
Response Time
ca. 8ms
63%
Frequency
60Hz
Response Time
ca. 6ms
Equipment Icon
Equipment Comparison
Samsung Q60T vs LG NANO81
60%
Operating System
Tizen 5.5
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2 Channels with 20 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
3
HDMI 2.1
USB 2.0
2
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ 1.4
1
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Ambilight
68%
Operating System
webOS 5.0
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
4
HDMI 2.1
USB 2.0
2
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ 1.4
1
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
integriert
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
You have found a bug and want to point it out to us? Report error

Our conclusion:
Q60T vs NANO81: VA vs IPS Panel

tvfindr Vitus
Vitus // tvfindr.com

Because of the better picture quality in dark environments and the similar one in bright surroundings, the Q60T is the slightly more powerful TV. However, you should keep in mind that the characteristics of these two TVs are very different. If you want better picture quality and an HDMI eARC to create the best possible sound when using an external sound system, the Q60T is the right TV for your needs. If you do not want to do without a wide viewing angle and also want to have superior motion handling, the NANO81 is a good choice. Since both devices are entry level TVs in the QLED or NanoCell series, additional features have not been integrated. Both TVs do not have Dolby Vision, Variable Refresh Rate and no HDMI 2.1 interface – which was not to be expected in this price level. So if you want to take next gen gaming to its limits, you have to buy the next most expensive TVs of the respective series, because the Q70T and the NANO86 have a 120Hz panel and an HDMI 2.1 interface. But if you can do without that and are looking for a decent Smart TV, which otherwise has a pretty good performance, you can take a closer look at both models.

Samsung QLED Q60T 2020
Samsung QLED Q60T
  • Deep Blacks
  • Low input lag
  • Good Smart Features
  • Smart Home Availability
  • Dolby Atmos via Dolby True HD
  • No local dimming
  • No DTS
  • No VRR
  • Viewing angle
43" (108cm)
QN43Q60TAFXZA
50" (125,7cm)
QN50Q60TAFXZA
55" (138,8cm)
QN55Q60TAFXZA
58" (146cm)
QN58Q60TAFXZA
65" (163,9cm)
QN65Q60TAFXZA
75" (189,3cm)
QN75Q60TAFXZA
85" (214cm)
QN85Q60TAFXZA
LG NANO81 2020
LG NANO81
  • Low input lag
  • Viewing angle
  • Edge Lit Local Dimming
  • Smart TV Features
  • 60Hz panel
  • Contrast ratio 1350:1
  • Black levels
  • No Dolby Vision & HDR10+
  • No DTS & Dolby Atmos
55" (139cm)
55NANO81ANA
65" (164cm)
65NANO81ANA
* Approximate price incl. VAT, plus shipping costs. Please note that prices shown here may have changed in the meantime.
All data without guarantee. All trademarks, designs and logos displayed are owned by their companies.
🔥 The Best TV deals and offers 🔥 Get them now!
Go to Deals