Samsung QN85A vs Q80T TV comparison 2021/04
Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! β₯οΈ
Samsung QN85A and Q80T compared β Which TV is better?
Detailed comparison: Samsung QN85A or Q80T
With anti-reflective coating
Both the QN85A and the Q80T are well suited for watching in bright rooms because they have an anti-reflective coating built in that can minimize reflections very well. The QN85A’s peak brightness of 1250 nitsSI unit of luminance: 1 nit = 1 cd/m2 – The best way of measuring and comparing a TVs brightness is definitely worth mentioning here, which allows HDRHigh Dynamic Range – image/video with more dynamic range (contrast range) content in particular to shine.
Significantly extended viewing angle
Thanks to the IPSIn-Plane Switching, type of LCD Panel panel, the QN85A has quite a wide viewing angle, which means that the picture still looks good even from a slanted sitting position. A VAVertical Alignment, type of LCD Panel panel is known for having a relatively narrow viewing angle, which is why the Q80T also has a wide viewing angle layer to significantly expand the viewing angle. Hence, you can enjoy a good picture even from an oblique angle.
Good TVs for SD content
SD content looks good on both TVs, whereby the VAVertical Alignment, type of LCD Panel panel of the Q80T is a bit more convincing with a high contrast and a deep black. However, the QN85A can counteract this problem well with Full Array Local Dimming. In addition, upscaling works great on both TVs, so low-quality content looks better.
Q80T has the lead here
Both TVs have to do without Dolby VisionDynamic HDR-format with a color depth of up to 12 Bits and Mastering of up to 10,000 Nits, which is why HDRHigh Dynamic Range – image/video with more dynamic range (contrast range) content is not dynamically optimized. In a direct comparison, the Q80T’s picture looks slightly better thanks to the high contrast and deep black, which makes details look simply wonderful. However, the QN85A’s many dimming zones can illuminate the picture better, which makes details easier to see.
For daytime home theater enjoyment
Both TVs are perfectly suitable for watching movies and series, whereby the Q80T also provides a better contrast and a deep black value. However, if you watch during the day, you should rather go for the QN85A, since reflections are kept away much better. However, dialogs are clearly understandable on both and the sound even follows the movement on the screen due to the Object Tracking Sound feature. Nevertheless, you have to do without DTSMulti-channel-sound-system (Surround Sound) competing with Dolby Digital on both TVs.
Very good for next-gen gaming
Both TVs are perfectly suited for gamers and also deliver 4K@120fps for the new consoles thanks to the HDMI 2.1 interface. In addition, both TVs support VRRVariable Refresh Rate – synchronizes the display’s refresh rate with the output refresh rate of the graphics card via FreeSyncVariable Refresh Rate with AMD graphics cards or consoles and can score with an average response time of 3 and 5 ms and an input lag of 10 and 13 ms, respectively. One advantage of the QN85A is that Full Array Local Dimming is now also enabled in Game mode and games also shine in a wonderful picture quality.
Fast and smooth
Due to the fast response time, both TVs are good candidates for watching sports events because movements are displayed smoothly. However, the QN85A’s low contrast can cause blooming in monochrome backgrounds, such as soccer.
Small differences
Both the QN85A and the model from last year have very similar features. Both have a twin tuner, an HDMI eARC connection, as well as timeshift and a USB recording function. However, the QN85A is again compatible with Google Assistant and has the new Tizen 6.0 operating system, which works incredibly smoothly and intuitively.
kompatibel
integriert
Our conclusion:Only a few differences despite new display technology
Samsung does not advertise with the new Mini LED technology for nothing, because the QN85A and the Q80T only differ slightly otherwise. The biggest difference is probably the panel, which is completely different on both TVs. The IPSIn-Plane Switching, type of LCD Panel panel allows for a significantly higher peak brightness, but the VAVertical Alignment, type of LCD Panel panel from the Q80T performs much better in terms of contrast and black level. However, it can really shine in bright rooms as it handles reflections well.
When it comes to gaming, both devices are a pleasure to use, as they hardly differ from each other in this respect. Both have an HDMI 2.1 port, which makes 4K@120fps possible, and the motion handling is also convincing. The QN85A also has Full Array Local Dimming enabled in Game mode, which means you get good picture quality even when gaming. In terms of sound, both TVs have to do without DTSMulti-channel-sound-system (Surround Sound) competing with Dolby Digital and the bass is rather poor on both. However, this can be easily remedied by connecting a soundbar.
In the end, the QN85A emerges as the winner in the comparison, even if you still get a very good mid-range TV in your living room with the Q80T. Especially users who like to watch during the day or in a very well-lit room will have fun with the Neo QLED. However, if you like to watch movies and series on your TV, the Q80T performs much better because it simply displays contrasts better and thus delivers a better picture.
- Full Array Local Dimming
- Brightness 1250 Nits
- AMD FreeSync
- Response Time 5ms
- Tizen 6.0
- Contrast and black level
- No Dolby Vision
- No DTS
- VA panel
- Contrast 4220:1
- Deep black
- Response Time 3ms
- HDMI Forum's VRR
- No DTS
- No Dolby Vision
