Samsung Q80T vs LG NANO90 TV comparison 2021/05

LG’s NanoCell series and Samsung’s QLED series are eternal competitors when it comes to the mid-range TV segment. The respective characteristics of the series differ immensely, so you should consider which TV you want to buy. When looking for a new TV, these two series are constantly being encountered, so we’ll compare two similarly powerful models here, namely the Samsung Q80T and the LG NANO90.

Samsung QLED Q80T
LG NANO90
vs
Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! ♥️ Best wishes, Kamil & Vitus

Samsung Q80T and LG NANO90 compared – Which TV is better?

Reflections Icon
Reflections
Image quality in bright environments and dealing with reflections
75%
Samsung QLED Q80T 55"
62%
LG NANO90 55"
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle
Picture quality when sitting at an angle to the TV - Also relevant when sitting very close in front of a large TV.
79%
Samsung QLED Q80T 55"
63%
LG NANO90 55"
SDR Image Quality Icon
SDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in SDR, i.e. anything that is not HDR.
76%
Samsung QLED Q80T 55"
66%
LG NANO90 55"
HDR Image Quality Icon
HDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in HDR, so everything from HDR, HDR10, HLG to HDR10+ & Dolby Vision.
62%
Samsung QLED Q80T 55"
58%
LG NANO90 55"
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series
Use of the TV for movies, series & documentaries - be it as stream, BluRay or in the TV program.
74%
Samsung QLED Q80T 55"
72%
LG NANO90 55"
Gaming Icon
Gaming
Gaming performance of the TV especially for responsive games with focus on PS5 and Xbox Series X
87%
Samsung QLED Q80T 55"
94%
LG NANO90 55"
Sports Icon
Sports
Suitability for watching soccer, Formula 1, Olympics and more, even with several persons
74%
Samsung QLED Q80T 55"
65%
LG NANO90 55"
Equipment Icon
Equipment
Smart TV features, connections and general equipment of the TV
69%
Samsung QLED Q80T 55"
80%
LG NANO90 55"
Samsung QLED Q80T 55"
LG NANO90 55"
Rating v2.0
Found a bug? Report error

Samsung QLED Q80T 2020

Direct LED with FALD
Direct LED with FALD
VA Panel
VA Panel
Wide Viewing Angle Layer
Wide Viewing Angle
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
Because the Samsung Q80T QLED uses a VA panel, it has a deep black and good contrast ratio. Due to the high peak brightness of ~820 Nits, it can also be used well in brighter rooms. Samsung has also compensated for the supposed disadvantage of VA panels with an additional display layer, which also has a positive effect on the reflection behavior. However, its contrast ratio and brightness is affected by this, which is still greater than that of the NANO90. HDR content is presented much more impressively, which is due to the brightness and the larger color gamut, which makes the colors look richer and more vivid. In terms of motion handling, both TVs perform excellently, but the Q80T is slightly ahead of the rest thanks to its shorter response time.
49" (123,1cm)
QN49Q80TAFXZA
55" (138,8cm)
QN55Q80TAFXZA
65" (163,9cm)
QN65Q80TAFXZA
75" (189,3cm)
QN75Q80TAFXZA
85" (214cm)
QN85Q80TAFXZA

LG NANO90 2020

Direct LED with FALD
Direct LED with FALD
IPS Panel
IPS Panel
The LG NANO91 is the most expensive TV in the NanoCell series and comes up with a good performance in bright surroundings and a wide viewing angle. However, it does not get as bright as the Q80T and is therefore not much better suited for use in bright rooms - the reflection handling of the IPS-Panel is excellent, but due to the Q80T's additional display layer the Samsung TV has an even better one. The NANO91 supports Dolby Vision, which allows HDR content to be dynamically optimized - the Q80T only supports HDR10+, which is rarely used. When it comes to gaming, the two perform similarly well and have all the features you need for a good gaming experience. A good input lag, a Variable Refresh r Rate, ALLM and an HDMI 2.1 interface are present in both devices. However, the Q80T has an even wider viewing angle, which makes gaming with several people on it a little more fun.
55" (139cm)
55NANO90UNA
65" (164cm)
65NANO90UNA
75" (189cm)
75NANO90UNA
86" (217cm)
86NANO90UNA

Detailed comparison: Samsung Q80T or LG NANO90

Samsung QLED Q80T 55" Check Deal
LG NANO90 55" Check Deal
Reflections Icon
Reflections Comparison
Samsung Q80T vs LG NANO90
75%
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
Contrast
4220 :1
Max. Brightness
710 Nits
Video technologies
62%
Reflections
Reflections visible
No layer against reflections
Contrast
1680 :1
Max. Brightness
640 Nits
Video technologies
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle Comparison
Samsung Q80T vs LG NANO90
79%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Viewing Angle
Wide Viewing Angle Layer
Wide Viewing Angle Layer
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
63%
Panel type
IPS Panel
IPS Panel
Viewing Angle
wide
IPS Viewing Angle
Reflections
Reflections visible
Reflections visible
SDR image Icon
SDR image Comparison
Samsung Q80T vs LG NANO90
76%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Direct LED with FALD
Direct LED with FALD
Local Dimming
Full Array Local Dimming with 48 Zones
Contrast
4220 :1
Max. Brightness
710 Nits
DCI-P3
87%
66%
Panel type
IPS Panel
IPS Panel
Backlight
Direct LED with FALD
Direct LED with FALD
Local Dimming
Full Array Local Dimming with 32 Zones
Contrast
1680 :1
Max. Brightness
640 Nits
DCI-P3
78%
HDR image Icon
HDR image Comparison
Samsung Q80T vs LG NANO90
62%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Direct LED with FALD
Direct LED with FALD
Local Dimming
Full Array Local Dimming with 48 Zones
Contrast
4220 :1
Max. Brightness
710 Nits
DCI-P3
87%
REC 2020
69%
Video technologies
58%
Panel type
IPS Panel
IPS Panel
Backlight
Direct LED with FALD
Direct LED with FALD
Local Dimming
Full Array Local Dimming with 32 Zones
Contrast
1680 :1
Max. Brightness
640 Nits
DCI-P3
78%
REC 2020
60%
Video technologies
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series Comparison
Samsung Q80T vs LG NANO90
74%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2.2.2 Channels with 60 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
72%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Gaming Icon
Gaming performance Comparison
Samsung Q80T vs LG NANO90
87%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 3.0ms
HDMI 2.1
1x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag [email protected] +HDR
ca. 13ms
94%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 4.4ms
HDMI 2.1
2x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag [email protected] +HDR
ca. 15ms
Sports Icon
Sports performance Comparison
Samsung Q80T vs LG NANO90
74%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 3.0ms
65%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 4.4ms
Equipment Icon
Equipment Comparison
Samsung Q80T vs LG NANO90
69%
Operating System
Tizen 5.5
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2.2.2 Channels with 60 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
3
HDMI 2.1
1
USB 2.0
2
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ 1.4
1
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Ambilight
80%
Operating System
webOS 5.0
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2.0 Channels with 20 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
2
HDMI 2.1
2
USB 2.0
3
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
1
Digital optical
1
Ci+ 1.4
1
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
integriert
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
You have found a bug and want to point it out to us? Report error

Our conclusion:
Q80T: The obvious winner

tvfindr Vitus
Vitus // tvfindr.com

The bottom line is that the performance of the Samsung Q80T QLED is definitely better than that of the LG NANO90. Thanks to the VA panel, the picture quality in dark rooms is more beautiful, due to the higher contrast ratio and the deep blacks – but this is a weak point in all TVs with an IPS panel. In bright rooms, the picture quality is quite similar, which is due to the Q80T’s higher peak brightness and the even better reflection handling. Unfortunately, the NANO90 shows the dirty screen effect. This is particularly annoying in scenes with large areas of the same color, such as a football field – but under normal conditions, this effect is not quite as noticeable. Next Gen Gaming with PS5 or Xbox Series X is a great experience on both devices, as they have all the features that enrich the gaming experience.

When playing a FIFA tournament with friends, neither TV has an unfair disadvantage of fading colors when viewed at an angle. The Q80T also performs better in this respect, but under most conditions the difference is not really noticeable.

As you can see, the Q80T is the better device in almost every category. Except the missing Dolby Vision there is hardly anything, where the NANO90 performs better.

Samsung QLED Q80T 2020
Samsung QLED Q80T
  • 120Hz VA-Panel
  • Full Array Local Dimming
  • Deep black
  • Contrast ratio 7300:1
  • Viewing angle
  • Dolby Atmos
  • HDMI eARC
  • HDMI 2.1
  • No Dolby Vision
49" (123,1cm)
QN49Q80TAFXZA
55" (138,8cm)
QN55Q80TAFXZA
65" (163,9cm)
QN65Q80TAFXZA
75" (189,3cm)
QN75Q80TAFXZA
85" (214cm)
QN85Q80TAFXZA
LG NANO90 2020
LG NANO90
  • 120Hz IPS panel
  • Full Array Local Dimming
  • Viewing angle
  • Reflection handling
  • Dolby Vision & Atmos
  • HDMI eARC
  • HDMI 2.1
  • Black levels
  • Contrast ratio 1680:1
  • Dirty Screen Effect
55" (139cm)
55NANO90UNA
65" (164cm)
65NANO90UNA
75" (189cm)
75NANO90UNA
86" (217cm)
86NANO90UNA
* Approximate price incl. VAT, plus shipping costs. Please note that prices shown here may have changed in the meantime.
All data without guarantee. All trademarks, designs and logos displayed are owned by their companies.
🔥 The Best TV deals and offers 🔥 Get them now!
Go to Deals