QLED vs OLED TV comparison 2022/02

QLED and OLED are two of the most important technical terms in the world of 4K TVs. The question of which technology is the better one is rightly raised. Therefore we compare QLED vs OLED TVs on this page and explain you exactly which advantages and disadvantages QLED and OLED TVs have and for which purpose they are intended.
Samsung QN90A Neo QLED
Sony A90J
vs
Hey! If you buy through our links, you support our project. It won't cost you a cent more! Many thanks in advance! β™₯️

QLED and OLED compared – Which TV is better?

Reflections Icon
Reflections
Image quality in bright environments and dealing with reflections
87%
Samsung QN90A Neo QLED 55"
74%
Sony A90J 55"
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle
Picture quality when sitting at an angle to the TV - Also relevant when sitting very close in front of a large TV.
78%
Samsung QN90A Neo QLED 55"
92%
Sony A90J 55"
SDR Image Quality Icon
SDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in SDR, i.e. anything that is not HDR.
88%
Samsung QN90A Neo QLED 55"
95%
Sony A90J 55"
HDR Image Quality Icon
HDR Image Quality
Picture quality when viewing material in HDR, so everything from HDR, HDR10, HLG to HDR10+ & Dolby Vision.
82%
Samsung QN90A Neo QLED 55"
88%
Sony A90J 55"
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series
Use of the TV for movies, series & documentaries - be it as stream, BluRay or in the TV program.
84%
Samsung QN90A Neo QLED 55"
93%
Sony A90J 55"
Gaming Icon
Gaming
Gaming performance of the TV especially for responsive games with focus on PS5 and Xbox Series X
97%
Samsung QN90A Neo QLED 55"
88%
Sony A90J 55"
Sports Icon
Sports
Suitability for watching soccer, Formula 1, Olympics and more, even with several persons
74%
Samsung QN90A Neo QLED 55"
81%
Sony A90J 55"
Equipment Icon
Equipment
Smart TV features, connections and general equipment of the TV
80%
Samsung QN90A Neo QLED 55"
89%
Sony A90J 55"
Samsung QN90A Neo QLED 55"
Sony A90J 55"
Rating v2.5
You want to support us?
Donate with Paypal

Samsung QN90A Neo QLED 2021

QLED


Mini LED with FALD
Mini LED with FALD
VA Panel
VA Panel
Wide Viewing Angle Layer
Wide Viewing Angle
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections

With the new Mini LED backlight, Samsung QLEDs are making a huge leap this year and the QN90A Neo QLED is the premium model of 2021 as a result. It gets very bright, although there may be some overexposure in dark scenes, but it also achieves a high contrast value that way. It is also perfectly suited for gaming thanks to its four HDMI 2.1 ports with all the advantages like VRR or ALLM. Unfortunately, Samsung still does not support Dolby Vision, but movies and series still look very good on the TV.

Sony A90J 2021

OLED


Heat Sink
Heat Sink
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel

The Sony A90J uses an OLED panel from LG Display and consequently has expected features. However, to stand out from the crowd of OLED TVs, Sony has given it some unique features. The new Cognitive Processor XR provides excellent image processing and motion interpolation, which is not available from the competition. It is only suitable for gamers to a limited extent, since not all functions of the HDMI 2.1 port are available yet, but it is an unbeatable choice for home cinema.

Detailed comparison: QLED or OLED

Reflections Icon
Reflections Comparison

QLED better for bright rooms

QLEDs can be much brighter and thus better cope with common lighting conditions. In addition, the expensive models usually have an additional layer built into the panel that can handle reflections even better. Thus, you can still enjoy your movies and series very well in light-flooded rooms. OLEDs do not perform as well here because they deliver a better performance in dark rooms.

87%
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
Contrast
26000 :1
Max. Brightness
1860 Nits
Video technologies
74%
Reflections
Reflections visible
No layer against reflections
Contrast
infinite :1
Max. Brightness
890 Nits
Video technologies
Viewing Angle Icon
Viewing Angle Comparison

OLED at an advantage

The viewing angle really depends on the model, but OLEDs are generally ahead here because their viewing angle is always very wide. Due to the VA panel installed in many QLED models, the viewing angle is quite narrow and the picture is usually washed out from an oblique angle. Some TVs therefore have an additional layer built into the panel, but that usually only applies to the expensive models.

78%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Viewing Angle
Wide Viewing Angle Layer
Wide Viewing Angle Layer
Reflections
Layer against reflections
Layer against reflections
92%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Viewing Angle
very wide
OLED Viewing Angle
Reflections
Reflections visible
Reflections visible
SDR image Icon
SDR image Comparison

Both technologies are similarly good

When watching series or the everyday TV program, both technologies are almost on the same wavelength. It is true that the OLED performs better due to its theoretically infinite contrast, which is simply due to the organic pixels. A TV with a local dimming function can do well against this, but they are usually not quite as precise.

88%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Mini LED with FALD
Mini LED with FALD
Local Dimming
Full Array Local Dimming with 576 Zones
Contrast
26000 :1
DCI-P3
ca. 90%
Energy consumption SDR
84 kWh / 1000 Hours
95%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Contrast
infinite :1
DCI-P3
ca. 79%
Energy consumption SDR
113 kWh / 1000 Hours
HDR image Icon
HDR image Comparison

Great picture on both TVs

The situation is a bit different in the HDR sector, since it depends very much on which HDR formats are supported. While Samsung still does not support Dolby Vision, Sony relies on a proprietary image optimization that cannot be displayed in values. However, it is one of the best on the market. Contrast and black level also make a big difference here, which is why an OLED tends to score a bit better.

82%
Panel type
VA Panel
VA Panel
Backlight
Mini LED with FALD
Mini LED with FALD
Local Dimming
Full Array Local Dimming with 576 Zones
Contrast
26000 :1
Max. Brightness
1860 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 90%
REC 2020
ca. 70%
Energy consumption HDR
165 kWh / 1000 Hours
Video technologies
88%
Panel type
OLED evo Panel
OLED evo Panel
Contrast
infinite :1
Max. Brightness
890 Nits
DCI-P3
ca. 79%
REC 2020
ca. 67%
Energy consumption HDR
112 kWh / 1000 Hours
Video technologies
Movies & Series Icon
Movies & Series Comparison

Both technologies perfect for home theater

Here, too, it depends on the details, but both technologies are perfectly suited for home cinema. Whether streaming services or the home media library – nothing stands in the way of a good picture quality.

84%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
4.2.2 Channels with 60 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
93%
HDR Image Quality
SDR Image Quality
Environment & Reflections
Tuner
Analog (NTSC/PAL/SECAM) DVB-T DVB-T2 DVB-C DVB-S DVB-S2
Twin Tuner
Audio
2.2 Channels with 60 Watt
Audio formats
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Gaming Icon
Gaming performance Comparison

Ideal for gaming

No matter if QLED or OLED, both technologies are perfectly suitable for gaming. Both technologies are suitable for gaming, but you should always keep an eye on certain additional features. For example, you absolutely need an HDMI 2.1 port for the current consoles to be able to use them to their full potential, and a low input lag and a fast response time also ensure a lot of gaming fun.

97%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 3ms
HDMI 2.1
1x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 10ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
ca. 5ms
88%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.2ms
HDMI 2.1
2x Connections
Variable Refresh Rate
Input Lag 4K@60Hz +HDR
ca. 16ms
Input Lag 4K@120Hz
ca. 12ms
Sports Icon
Sports performance Comparison

Great for next season

Both technologies are well suited for watching sports events. TVs with a frequency of 120 Hz and a low response time are ideal so that everything is displayed smoothly. However, if you mainly watch sports during the day, you should rather go for a QLED, unless you can darken the living room.

74%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 3ms
DCI-P3
ca. 90%
81%
Frequency
120Hz
Response Time
ca. 0.2ms
DCI-P3
ca. 79%
Equipment Icon
Equipment Comparison

Very good smart TVs

Basically, both technologies are excellent smart TVs and most current TVs are equipped with everything you need. There are hardly any differences in operating systems in particular, and you should look individually to see which one suits you best. In the end, it still depends on connections or functions that are better represented in one brand than in another.

80%
Operating System
Tizen 6.0
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
4.2.2 Channels with 60 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
3
HDMI 2.1
1
USB 2.0
2
USB 3.0
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
kompatibel
Amazon Alexa
integriert
Ambilight
One Connect Box
89%
Operating System
Google TV
Bluetooth
Twin Tuner
Integrated soundbar
Audio
2.2 Channels with 60 Watt
HDMI ARC / eARC
/
Audio formats
USB recording PVR
HDMI 2.0
2
HDMI 2.1
2
USB 2.0
2
USB 3.0
1
Ethernet RJ45
1
3.5mm jack
1
Digital optical
1
Ci+ Slots
Ci+ 1.4
Timeshift
Apple Airplay
Apple Homekit
Assistants
Google Assistant
integriert
Amazon Alexa
kompatibel
Ambilight
One Connect Box
You have found a bug and want to point it out to us? Report error

Our conclusion:
Should I buy a QLED or an OLED?

Deciding which TV to buy isn’t necessarily easy. While both technologies deliver fantastic results that should please most people, it is advisable to choose one that suits your individual needs and fits well with your lighting conditions. QLEDs are the better all-rounders here, while an OLED TV simply offers unmatched contrast and the perfect black.

Also, feel free to check out our FAQs if you have any unanswered questions.

You want to support us?
Donate with Paypal
Samsung QN90A Neo QLED 2021
84%
Samsung QN90A Neo QLED
  • Very deep black
  • Contrast of 26000:1
  • Full Array Local Dimming with 576 zones
  • Wide viewing angle
  • Very smooth, clear movements
  • Overexposure
  • No Dolby Vision
  • No DTS
Sony A90J 2021
88%
Sony A90J
  • Perfect black
  • Contrast of ∞:1
  • Very good viewing angle
  • Clear movements
  • Dolby Atmos and DTS:X thanks to HDMI eARC
  • Acoustic Surface Audio+
  • Automatic Brightness Limiter (ABL)
  • No VRR & ALLM

Frequently asked questions about QLED vs OLED

The technical difference that is most noticeable is the type of panel and its light source. While the backlight of a QLED works via LEDs, it is the pixels themselves that light up in OLED TVs. This also results in the almost infinite contrast that a QLED cannot achieve with LED backlighting.

The abbreviation OLED stands for organic light emitting diode and here the word organic is especially interesting. The term comes from organic chemistry, which deals with carbon compounds. Each individual pixel of the OLED panel consists of 4 sub pixels (white, red, green and blue), which can emit light in the corresponding color at different intensities. To display the perfect black, which OLED TVs are known for, the pixels simply turn off completely.

The basis of every QLED panel is a normal LCD panel. In addition, a quantum dot layer is added, which splits the light of the backlight into the monochromatic wavelengths of red, green or blue. This splitting primarily achieves higher brightness and a better gamut.

The technology can be found under a different name with other manufacturers. Sony calls it Triluminous, LG calls it Nano Cell, Hisense ULED, and only Samsung and TCL explicitly call it QLED technology.

QD OLEDs were newly introduced in 2022 and could be a mixture of OLED and QLED technology from the name. Technically, they kind of are. The TVs have a blue, self-luminous OLED layer, on which there are quantum dots in red and green. A white sub pixel layer no longer exists. This allows the QD OLEDs to be much brighter and the color representation is also much broader.

QLED TVs can have both an IPS and a VA panel. Both bring significant differences that should be considered before buying.

A VA panel always offers a narrow viewing angle, but also a better contrast and black value. However, it also depends on the installed backlight and the available local dimming.

An IPS panel always has a very wide viewing angle, but this has a negative effect on the contrast and black value. If a TV has an ADS panel, it is comparable to the values of an IPS panel.

While the organic pixels of an OLED TV light up themselves and can thus also be dimmed, a QLED TV needs help from a local dimming function to achieve a high contrast and deep black.

The backlight of a QLED TV is dimmed independently in different zones. Only this achieves a significantly higher contrast. In addition, the corresponding dimming algorithm has to work well so that a satisfactory result can be achieved here.

Sony can score here with its in-house technology XR Backlight Master Drive, whose algorithm optimizes the backlight. The brightness is increased significantly and the blooming effect is reduced.

While users of QLED TVs do not have to worry about burned-in content in the panel, the burn-in risk is still an issue with OLED TVs. However, it is only a theoretical concern for most users because manufacturers have meanwhile installed various features to keep the risk as low as possible.

Current OLED TVs achieve average values of 300-400 nits for SDR content and 700-900 nits for HDR content. For most users, this is completely sufficient and the trend is increasing here, since better features are built in to preserve the pixels, but increase the brightness. However, QLEDs get even brighter and are therefore also suitable for light-flooded living rooms.

A brighter display is also more suitable when it comes to reflections. Many QLEDs perform better here because the expensive models in particular have an additional layer that can handle light reflections better.

Both technologies are perfect for gaming and there are no major differences. Meanwhile, most current TVs are equipped with an HDMI 2.1 port, so the power of the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X can also be used. However, you should pay attention to other details like VRR, a low response time and a low input lag.

For home cinema, we usually recommend an OLED TV, since the contrast is much higher than with QLED TVs. Thus, HDR content is simply terrific, since a contrast ratio of ∞:1 and a perfect black can be achieved here. Furthermore, you do not have to deal with picture errors like banding, clouding or black crush, which have their origin in poor or non-existent local dimming.

The true-to-life representation of colors is particularly noteworthy here, and dark scenes in particular come into their own very well. Meanwhile, OLED TVs are also available in huge 83 or even 97 inches, which means you really have your own movie screen at home.

All of today’s OLED displays for TVs are manufactured by LG Display. However, the South Korean company also resells its displays, which is why Sony, Philips, Panasonic, Hisense and many other manufacturers source their panels from LG.

Manufacturers like Panasonic additionally refine their panels with things like a heat sink so that they stand out from the standard panel. LG’s Evo panel in the G1 is also just a refined panel that will probably be found more often in the future.

* Prices incl. VAT, plus shipping costs. Please note that prices shown here may have changed in the meantime. All data without guarantee. Most of the time, these are so-called affiliate links. If you click on such an affiliate link and buy through this link, we get a commission from the relevant online store or provider. The price does not change for you.
Not found what you were looking for?